Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-101 (2026)

Nebraska Criminal Code, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 28-101 to 28-1358, 28-1601 to 28-1603, and 28-1701 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Criminal Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. v. Hadley, 648 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 2002).
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. v. Hadley, 648 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 4× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 28-101 through 28-1348 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Edwards, 767 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “[27] See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-101 to 28-1350 (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Jedlicka, 305 Neb. 52 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “21 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-101 to 28-1357 and 28-1601 to 28-1603 (Reissue 2016, Cum.”
Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 5× “PURPOSE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-101 provides: “Sections 28-101 to 28-1350 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Criminal Code.”
State v. Dat, 318 Neb. 311 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 3× ““We have never required that an assault culminate in visible markings in order to be labeled as such.”
State v. Hagens, 320 Neb. 65 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “7 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-101 (Cum. Supp. 2024) (identifying sections of Nebraska Criminal Code).”
State v. Evans, 316 Neb. 943 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 4× “The Nebraska Criminal Code, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-101 to 28-1357, 28-1601 to 28-1603, and 28-1701 (Reissue 2016, Cum.”
State v. Knaff, 285 N.W.2d 115 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “He assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to instruct on the lesser-included offense of larceny from the person, its failure to *713 order a new trial when it was discovered that the State had not complied with a pretrial disclosure order, and that although the crime was…”
Casbah, Inc. v. Thone, 512 F. Supp. 474 (D. Neb. 1980). “§§ 28-101 and 28-439. 4 . For example, legislation similar to L.”
City of Hastings v. Hughes (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Hughes did commence construction [on a building on] Hastings [Avenue] without drawings or documents, sealed by a licensed architect, contrary to the ordinances of the City of Hastings, Nebraska, and particularly contrary to Hastings City Code Section 28-101, 107.1 of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.