Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 28
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-101 (2026)

Nebraska Criminal Code, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 28-101 to 28-1358, 28-1601 to 28-1603, and 28-1701 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Criminal Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. v. Hadley, 648 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. v. Hadley, 648 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 4× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 28-101 through 28-1348 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Edwards, 767 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “[27] See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-101 to 28-1350 (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Jedlicka, 938 N.W.2d 854 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “- 62 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports STATE v.”
State v. Evans, 7 N.W.3d 650 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 4× “The Nebraska Criminal Code, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-101 to 28-1357, 28-1601 to 28-1603, and 28-1701 (Reissue 2016, Cum.”
Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 5× “PURPOSE OF THE CRIMINAL CODE Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-101 provides: “Sections 28-101 to 28-1350 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Criminal Code.”
State v. Hagens, 26 N.W.3d 174 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “and observed that she “looked a little red down there.” We read Hagens’ argument to attack J.”
State v. Knaff, 285 N.W.2d 115 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “He assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to instruct on the lesser-included offense of larceny from the person, its failure to *713 order a new trial when it was discovered that the State had not complied with a pretrial disclosure order, and that although the crime was…”
State v. Dat, 15 N.W.3d 410 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 3× “DAT Appeals previously reached virtually the same conclusion in an unpublished decision. 23 [8] Also, there are certain circumstances where bodily injury can be inferred.”
Casbah, Inc. v. Thone, 512 F. Supp. 474 (D. Neb. 1980). “§§ 28-101 and 28-439. 4 . For example, legislation similar to L.”
City of Hastings v. Hughes, No. A-13-476 (Neb. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2014). · cites it 2× “Hughes did commence construction [on a building on] Hastings [Avenue] without drawings or documents, sealed by a licensed architect, contrary to the ordinances of the City of Hastings, Nebraska, and particularly contrary to Hastings City Code Section 28-101, 107.1 of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.