Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 28
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-450 (2026)

Ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine; immediate precursor; prohibited acts; violation; penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall sell, distribute, or otherwise transfer any drug product containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine, or their salts, isomers, or salts of isomers, if the person knows that the transferee will use the drug product as an immediate precursor to any controlled substance. No person shall unlawfully sell, distribute, or otherwise transfer such a product with reckless disregard as to how the drug product will be used. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a Class III misdemeanor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1950–1986 · leading case: State v. Wehrle, 395 N.W.2d 142 (Neb. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wehrle, 395 N.W.2d 142 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-450 (Reissue 1948). The information filed in May did not include an allegation that a divorce decree had been rendered “against” May requiring payment of child support.”
Koch v. Grimminger, 223 N.W.2d 833 (Neb. 1974). · cites it 2× “eported to the defendant Sam Grimminger that the plaintiff was in arrears in the support payments and she that day requested Grimminger to file a criminal complaint against the plaintiff; that on February 23, 1971, Grimminger did file a criminal complaint against him; (the…”
May v. State, 44 N.W.2d 636 (Neb. 1950). “The statute defining the crime of failure to pay, without justifiable reason, previously adjudged amounts for child support (§ 28-450, R. R. S. 1943) contains these provisions: “Whenever any husband, against whom a decree for divorce and alimony for the support of his children…”
State v. Journey, 184 N.W.2d 616 (Neb. 1971). · cites it 2× “Defendant was prosecuted under section 28-450, R. R. S. 1943. That section provides that each failure to pay a separate installment of support money as provided in the divorce decree shall he a separate offense.”
State v. Easley, 299 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 2× “Appellant contends that defendant could only be charged under Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-450 (Reissue 1975). This argument is without merit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.