Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1604 (2026)

Information; procedure; law applicable

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of the criminal code in relation to indictments, and all other provisions of law, applying to prosecutions upon indictments to writs and process therein, and the issuing and service thereof, to motions, pleadings, trials and punishments or the execution of any sentence, and to all other proceedings in cases of indictments, whether in the court of original or appellate jurisdiction, shall in the same manner and to the same extent, as nearly as may be, apply to informations, and all prosecutions and proceedings thereon.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1940–2026 · leading case: State v. Schanaman, 835 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Schanaman, 835 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 3× “” And although Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1604 (Reissue 2008) specifically extends indictment procedure to informations, there is no such provision extending indictment procedure to complaints.”
State v. Muse, 721 N.W.2d 661 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1604 (Reissue 1995) generally applies the laws concerning prosecution upon indictments to prosecutions and proceedings upon informations.”
State v. Nearhood, 448 N.W.2d 399 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “In addition, Nearhood complains that his initial attorney failed to object to proceeding on the amended information immediately after the amendment was made.”
Hawk v. State, 39 N.W.2d 561 (Neb. 1949). · cites it 2× “In compliance with said sections the petitioner was served with a copy of the information by the warden of the Leavenworth penitentiary on February 20, 1936. He was not called upon to answer to the information before one day had elapsed from the time he was served with it.”
Svehla v. State, 96 N.W.2d 649 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 2× “” Section 29-1604, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “The provisions of the criminal code in relation to indictments, and all other provisions of law, applying to prosecutions upon indictments to writs and process therein, and the issuing and service thereof, * * * shall in the…”
State v. Harig, 218 N.W.2d 884 (Neb. 1974). “for omitting to state the time at which the offense was committed in any case where time is not the essence of the offense; nor for stating the time imperfectly;.”
Benedict v. State, 89 N.W.2d 82 (Neb. 1958). · cites it 2× “’ * * Section 29-1604, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “The provisions of the criminal code in relation to indictments, and all other provisions of law, applying to prosecutions upon indictments to writs and process therein, and the issuing and service thereof, to motions, pleadings,…”
Shepperd v. State, 96 N.W.2d 261 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 2× “” Section 29-1604, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “The provisions of the criminal code in relation to indict *467 ments, and all other provisions of law, applying to prosecutions upon indictments to writs and process therein, and the issuing and service thereof, * * * shall in…”
Jurgenson v. State, 88 N.W.2d 129 (Neb. 1958). · cites it 2× “” Section 29-1604, R. R. S. 1943, provides that the law relating to indictments applies to informations in the same manner and to the same extent.”
State ex rel. Gossett v. O'Grady, 291 N.W. 497 (Neb. 1940). · cites it 4× “” In section 29-1604 we find the following: “The provisions of the criminal code in relation to indictments, and all other provisions of law, applying to prosecutions upon indictments to writs and process therein, and the issuing and service thereof, to motions, pleadings,…”
Darlington v. State, 44 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1950). “” The law does not specify any length of time that must elapse between the filing of an information or indictment and the commencement of the trial of a defendant in the district court for the crime charged therein against him, except that a defendant may not without his consent…”
State v. Simpson (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “” This section generally applies to informations, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1604 (Reissue 2016); however, the purpose of the 24-hour waiting period provided for by § 29-1802 is to ensure that the defendant has a reasonable amount of time to prepare his or her defense.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.