Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (2026)
Defects; when considered waived
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash, or a plea in abatement, by demurring to an indictment or pleading in bar or the general issue.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1945–2023 · leading case: State v. Valencia, 290 N.W.2d 181 (Neb. 1980).
State v. Valencia, 290 N.W.2d 181 (Neb. 1980). “" Finally, section 29-1812, R.R.S.1943, provides: "The accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash, or a plea in abatement, by demurring to an indictment or pleading in bar or the general issue.”
State v. Liston, 712 N.W.2d 264 (Neb. 2006). “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1995), this court has held that once a defendant has entered a plea, or a plea is entered for the defendant by the court, the defendant waives all facial constitutional challenges to a statute unless that defendant asks leave of the…”
State v. Johnson, 988 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 2023). “In doing so, we said that the “failure to give a prisoner a preliminary examination does not oust the district court of jurisdiction” but is a “mere defect in the proceedings,” which, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 2016), may be excepted to by a motion to quash,…”
Nelson v. State, 94 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 1959). “” § 29-1812, R. R. S. 1943. The State then contends that section 29-1812, R.”
State v. Golgert, 395 N.W.2d 520 (Neb. 1986). “Next, the State argues that Golgert, by his nolo contendere plea, has waived any defect of the complaint regarding the omitted allegation that operation or actual physical control occurred on a public highway, and directs our attention to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue…”
State v. Severin, 553 N.W.2d 452 (Neb. 1996). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1995) provides that a defendant who pleads to the general issue waives all defects which might have been attacked by a motion to quash.”
State v. Carpenter, 551 N.W.2d 518 (Neb. 1996). “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Owen, 510 N.W.2d 503 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1989) (by pleading the general issue, the accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash).”
State v. McIntyre, 290 Neb. 1021 (Neb. 2015). “” Thus, we have held that a defendant’s failure to move to quash an infor- mation generally waives any objections to it.”
State v. Conklin, 545 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 1996). “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1989).”
State v. Coleman, 311 N.W.2d 911 (Neb. 1981). “” The effect of failing to object, as provided for in § 29-1808, is as provided for by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1812 (Reissue 1979) which states: “The accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash, or a plea in abatement, by…”
State v. Ninneman, 140 N.W.2d 5 (Neb. 1966). “Section 29-1812, R.R.S.1943, provides: "The accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash, or a plea in abatement, by demurring to an indictment or pleading in bar or the general issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.