Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (2026)

Plea of guilty or nolo contendere; advisement required; effect

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any offense punishable as a crime under state law, except offenses designated as infractions under state law, the court shall administer the following advisement on the record to the defendant:

IF YOU ARE NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN, YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT CONVICTION OF THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED MAY HAVE THE CONSEQUENCES OF REMOVAL FROM THE UNITED STATES, OR DENIAL OF NATURALIZATION PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: State v. Garcia, 301 Neb. 912 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Garcia, 301 Neb. 912 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 61× “" With the exception of the use of the singular form of the word "consequence," the foregoing is a verbatim recitation of the statutory advisement courts are required to administer prior to the acceptance of a guilty or no contest plea under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1)…”
State v. Medina-Liborio, 829 N.W.2d 96 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 41× “82, § 13, codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 22× “*581 Because we dispose of the appeal on this basis, we do not reach the State's arguments that "substantial compliance" with the requirements of § 29-1819.”
State v. Jerke, 302 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 10× “The plea colloquy included an advisement pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016), which provides: Prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any offense punishable as a crime under state law, except offenses designated as infractions under…”
State v. Gonzalez, 830 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 10× “1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Rodriguez-Torres, 746 N.W.2d 686 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 6× “[3] Rodriguez-Torres' motion to vacate judgment and allow for withdrawal of guilty pleas is premised on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Cum. Supp. 2006).”
State v. Gach, 297 Neb. 96 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 30× “Failure to give all or part of the advisement required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016) regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty or nolo contendere plea is not alone sufficient to entitle a convicted defendant to have the conviction vacated and the…”
State v. Chiroy Osorio, 837 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 13× “At the time of the 2002 plea, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Reissue 2008) was not yet in effect.”
State v. Yuma, 835 N.W.2d 679 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 4× “STANDARD OF REVIEW [1] An appellate court determines jurisdictional questions that do not involve a factual dispute as a matter of law.3 ANALYSIS As we recently noted in Gonzalez,4 a defendant seeking to withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere after his or her conviction…”
State v. Bol, 882 N.W.2d 674 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 3× “” The court had a duty to advise Bol about the immigration consequences of his plea under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Cisneros, 704 N.W.2d 550 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Cum. Supp. 2004).”
Banks v. Heineman, 837 N.W.2d 70 (Neb. 2013). “Nebraska Advance Sheets 390 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS Osorio’s failure to so much as allege the necessary elements of relief under the postconviction statutes or § 29-1819.02, we find the district court’s failure to articulate its reasoning inconsequential.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02(1) — 10 cases
State v. Garcia, 301 Neb. 912 (Neb. 2018). “" With the exception of the use of the singular form of the word "consequence," the foregoing is a verbatim recitation of the statutory advisement courts are required to administer prior to the acceptance of a guilty or no contest plea under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1)…”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “*581 Because we dispose of the appeal on this basis, we do not reach the State's arguments that "substantial compliance" with the requirements of § 29-1819.”
State v. Jerke, 302 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2019). “The plea colloquy included an advisement pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016), which provides: Prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any offense punishable as a crime under state law, except offenses designated as infractions under…”
State v. Gach, 297 Neb. 96 (Neb. 2017). “Failure to give all or part of the advisement required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016) regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty or nolo contendere plea is not alone sufficient to entitle a convicted defendant to have the conviction vacated and the…”
State v. Garcia, 301 Neb. 912 (Neb. 2018).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02(2) — 13 cases
State v. Garcia, 301 Neb. 912 (Neb. 2018). “" With the exception of the use of the singular form of the word "consequence," the foregoing is a verbatim recitation of the statutory advisement courts are required to administer prior to the acceptance of a guilty or no contest plea under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1)…”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “*581 Because we dispose of the appeal on this basis, we do not reach the State's arguments that "substantial compliance" with the requirements of § 29-1819.”
State v. Jerke, 302 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2019). “The plea colloquy included an advisement pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016), which provides: Prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any offense punishable as a crime under state law, except offenses designated as infractions under…”
State v. Gach, 297 Neb. 96 (Neb. 2017). “Failure to give all or part of the advisement required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2016) regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty or nolo contendere plea is not alone sufficient to entitle a convicted defendant to have the conviction vacated and the…”
State v. Bol, 882 N.W.2d 674 (Neb. 2016). “” The court had a duty to advise Bol about the immigration consequences of his plea under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (1) (Reissue 2008).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02(3) — 3 cases
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “*581 Because we dispose of the appeal on this basis, we do not reach the State's arguments that "substantial compliance" with the requirements of § 29-1819.”
State v. Chiroy Osorio, 837 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 2013). “At the time of the 2002 plea, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1819.02 (Reissue 2008) was not yet in effect.”
State v. Rodriguez (Neb. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.