Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2291 (2026)

Misdemeanor domestic violence conviction; notification to defendant; State Court Administrator's Office; duty

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) When sentencing a person convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(33), as such section existed on July 18, 2008, the court shall provide written or oral notification to the defendant that it may be a violation of federal law for the individual: To ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

(2) The State Court Administrator's Office shall create a standard notification that provides the information in subsection (1) of this section and shall provide a copy of such notification to all judges in this state.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Scalise v. Davis, 980 N.W.2d 27 (Neb. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Scalise v. Davis, 980 N.W.2d 27 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 5× “In order to be considered by an appellate court, an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error.”

Scalist v. Davis, 312 Neb. 518 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 5× “In order to be considered by an appellate court, an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2291(1) — 2 cases

Scalise v. Davis, 980 N.W.2d 27 (Neb. 2022). “In order to be considered by an appellate court, an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error.”

Scalist v. Davis, 312 Neb. 518 (Neb. 2022). “In order to be considered by an appellate court, an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.