Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2532 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

29-2532.

Transferred to section 83-964.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1994–2008 · leading case: State v. Mata, 745 N.W.2d 229 (Neb. 2008).
State v. Mata, 745 N.W.2d 229 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 8× “Finally, Mata assigns that the district court erred in failing to hold that electrocution as the sole method of judicial execution under Neb.Rev. Stat. § 29-2532 (Reissue 1995) is unconstitutional.”
Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008). · cites it 2× “Nebraska is the only State whose statutes specify electrocution as the sole method of execution, see Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2532 (1995), but the Nebraska Supreme Court recently struck down that method under the Nebraska Constitution, see State v.”
State v. Moore, 718 N.W.2d 537 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 4× “I, §§ 3, 9, and 15, and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2532 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Reeves, 604 N.W.2d 151 (Neb. 2000). “Reeves also alleges in his second post-conviction petition that death by electrocution as prescribed by § 29-2532 is cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by U.”
State v. Palmer, 518 N.W.2d 899 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “on said day, in the manner provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2532 (Reissue 1989).”
State v. Moore, 730 N.W.2d 563 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 4× “Mindful of the gravity of the matter, I write separately to note my concern at the issuance of a stay on the court's own motion.”
Williams v. Hopkins, 983 F. Supp. 891 (D. Neb. 1997). · cites it 16× “Under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Williams essentially makes two claims: (1) overall, death by electrocution is both cruel and unusual punishment; and (2) since Hopkins intends to violate the mandate of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2532 (Michie 1995) by using multiple…”
State v. Otey, 518 N.W.2d 901 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “on said day, in the manner provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2532 (Reissue 1989).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.