Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3528 (2026)

Violations; person aggrieved; remedies

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever any officer or employee of the state, its agencies, or its political subdivisions, or whenever any state agency or any political subdivision or its agencies fails to comply with the requirements of sections 29-209, 29-210, 29-3501 to 29-3528, and 81-1423 or of regulations lawfully adopted to implement sections 29-209, 29-210, 29-3501 to 29-3528, and 81-1423, any person aggrieved may bring an action, including but not limited to an action for mandamus, to compel compliance and such action may be brought in the district court of any district in which the records involved are located or in the district court of Lancaster County. The commission may request the Attorney General to bring such action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2022 · leading case: State ex rel. Rhiley v. Nebraska State Patrol, 301 Neb. 241 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Rhiley v. Nebraska State Patrol, 301 Neb. 241 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 25× “Rhiley claims that § 29-3528 authorizes a mandamus action directly against the NSP to compel compliance with the Criminal History Act.”
State v. Coble, 299 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 6× “18 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3528 (Reissue 2016).”
Doe v. State, 312 Neb. 665 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 4× “” 53 Additionally, § 29-3528 authorizes an aggrieved person to compel governmental actors to comply with the requirements of the Criminal History Act and provides: Whenever any officer or employee of the state, its agencies, or its political subdivisions, or whenever any state…”
State ex rel. Rhiley v. Nebraska State Patrol, 301 Neb. 241 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 24× “§ 29-3528 (Reissue 2016) does not expressly waive sovereign - 242 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 301 Nebraska R eports STATE EX REL.”
Doe v. State, 312 Neb. 665 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 4× “” 53 Additionally, § 29-3528 authorizes an aggrieved person to compel governmental actors to comply with the requirements of the Criminal History Act and provides: Whenever any officer or employee of the state, its agencies, or its political subdivisions, or whenever any state…”
State v. Coble, 299 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 6× “19 Jurisdiction over a motion is therefore dependent upon the court’s having jurisdic- tion over the case in which the motion is filed.20 A court has jurisdiction to issue orders on motions pertaining to incidental matters within the scope of the action over which the court has…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.