Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3801 (2026)

Terms, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in sections 29-3801 to 29-3809, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) Director shall mean the Director of Correctional Services; and

(2) Prosecutor shall mean a prosecuting attorney as defined in section 29-104.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: State v. Yzeta, 983 N.W.2d 124 (Neb. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Yzeta, 983 N.W.2d 124 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 14× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 2016) provide a procedure by which a Nebraska prison inmate may assert his or her right to a speedy trial on pending Nebraska charges.”
State v. Kolbjornsen, 888 N.W.2d 153 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “But we have previously held that the latter statutory procedure, rather than the former, applies to instate prisoners.”
State v. Tucker, 609 N.W.2d 306 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 6× “§§ 29-1201 to 29-1209 (Reissue 1995) or, as the State *229 contends on appeal, the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995), by which a Nebraska prison inmate may assert his or her right to a speedy trial on pending Nebraska charges.”
State v. Caldwell, 639 N.W.2d 663 (Neb. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 15× “Caldwell filed a motion to discharge after his trial date was continued beyond the 180-day time limit set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Steele, 624 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 3× “The State argues that the statutory scheme of the Agreement, § 29-759, is remarkably similar to the procedural requirements for obtaining a final disposition of outstanding charges under Nebraska’s disposition of untried charges statutes, which govern the resolution of pending…”
State v. Ebert, 455 N.W.2d 165 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 8× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1989) provide a procedure by which a Nebraska prison inmate may assert his or her right to a speedy trial on pending Nebraska charges.”
State v. Soule, 379 N.W.2d 762 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 7× “591 (effective March 3, 1984), now reflected in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 et seq. (Cum. Supp.”
State v. LeFever, 970 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 19× “The statutory speedy trial rights of instate prisoners are governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 2016), and the procedure under Neb.”
State v. Rieger, 708 N.W.2d 630 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 3× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995).”
Bradley v. Hopkins, 522 N.W.2d 394 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 3× “He asserts such was the case because he was not tried within the time required by Nebraska’s “disposition of untried charges” statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 through 29-3809 (Reissue 1989), hereinafter referred to as the act.”
State v. Rouse, 688 N.W.2d 889 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “Rouse’s motion to discharge because the 180-day time limit set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995) (instate prisoner statutes) had expired.”
State v. Chamberlain (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 14× “The district court determined that Chamberlain’s right to a speedy trial was governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 through 29-3809 (Reissue 2008), and not by § 29-1205 et seq.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.