Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4501 (2026)

Legislative findings

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Legislature finds that to electronically record statements made during a custodial interrogation is an effective way to document a free, knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of a person's right to remain silent, to agree to answer questions, to decide to have an attorney present during such questioning, and to decide to have an attorney provided to such person if he or she cannot afford an attorney, as provided by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Nebraska. Providing a record of the statement made during a custodial interrogation and any waiver of constitutional rights will reduce speculation and claims that may arise as to the content of the statement. Such a record of the content of the statement will aid law enforcement officers in analyzing and rejecting untruthful statements and will aid the factfinder in determining whether a statement was freely, knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2019 · leading case: State v. Barros, 24 A.3d 1158 (R.I. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Barros, 24 A.3d 1158 (R.I. 2011). “700 (West 2009) (requiring the recording of custodial interviews of suspects of specified felonies if recording equipment is available and *1190 recording is feasible)); Nebraska (Neb. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 29-4501 to § 29-4508 (LexisNexis 2008) (§ 29-4504 says, "a court shall…”

State v. Hasim Munir, 209 A.3d 545 (2019). “§§ 46-4-406 - 411 (2009) (Montana); Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4501 -4508 (2008) (Nebraska); N.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.