Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-823 (2026)

Motion to suppress; issues of fact; trial

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Issues of fact arising on motions to suppress shall be tried by the court without a jury, in a summary manner, on affidavits or otherwise, as the court may direct. No evidence shall be suppressed because of technical irregularities not affecting the substantial rights of the accused.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1965–2024 · leading case: State v. Anderson, 317 Neb. 435 (Neb. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Anderson, 317 Neb. 435 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-823 (Reissue 2016) (“[n]o evidence shall be suppressed because of technical irregularities not affecting the substantial rights of the accused”).”
State v. Brennen, 336 N.W.2d 79 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-823 (Reissue 1979); State v.”
State v. Putnam, 133 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 1965). “The statute is indicative of this conclusion in stating: “Issues of fact arising on motions to suppress shall be tried by the court without a jury, in a summary manner, on affidavits or otherwise, as the court may direct.”
State v. Kohout, 251 N.W.2d 723 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 4× “The State relies on section 29-823, R.R.S.1943, which provides in part: "No evidence shall be suppressed because of technical irregularities not affecting the substantial rights of the accused.”
State v. Svendgard, 986 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-823 (Reissue 2016) (no evidence shall be suppressed because of technical irregularities not affecting substantial rights of accused).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.