(1) The Division of Aeronautics shall be a division of the Department of Transportation.
(2)(a) Until December 31, 2017, the chief administrative officer of the division shall be the director, to be known as the Director of Aeronautics, and shall be appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Legislature, with due regard to his or her fitness through aeronautical education and by knowledge of and recent practical experience in aeronautics. The director shall devote full time to the performance of his or her official duties and shall not have any pecuniary interest in, stock in, or bonds of any civil aeronautics enterprise. The director shall, before assuming the duties of the office, take and subscribe an oath, such as is required by state officers. The director shall be bonded or insured as required by section 11-201. The director shall receive such compensation as the Governor, with the approval of the commission, shall determine, subject to the provisions of the legislative appropriations bill.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2018, the chief administrative officer of the division shall be the Director of Aeronautics who shall be appointed by and report directly to the Director-State Engineer, subject to confirmation by the Legislature, with due regard to his or her fitness through aeronautical education and by knowledge of and recent practical experience in aeronautics. The director shall devote full time to the performance of his or her official duties and shall not have any pecuniary interest in, stock in, or bonds of any civil aeronautics enterprise. The director shall, before assuming the duties of the office, take and subscribe an oath, such as is required by state officers.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1961–2025 · leading case:
Rodehorst v. Gartner, 669 N.W.2d 679 (Neb. 2003).
Rodehorst v. Gartner, 669 N.W.2d 679 (Neb. 2003).
“In that he signed the notes and is identified therein as a person undertaking to pay, Rodehorst was a “maker” of the notes as defined by § 3-103(5). However, § 3-419(a) provides that [i]f an instmment is issued for value given for the benefit of a party to the instmment…”
Emerson v. Zagurski, 531 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 2× “§ 3-103(a)(6). Neb. U.C.C. § 3-104 (Reissue 1992) provides that an instrument is negotiable if the following requirements are met.”
State Ex Rel. Beck v. Obbink, 109 N.W.2d 288 (Neb. 1961).
· cites it 6× “Obbink, who will be hereinafter referred to as respondent, was on April 30, 1959, appointed to the office of Director of Aeronautics of the State of Nebraska, pursuant to section 3-103, R. R. S. 1943; that he accepted the appointment, qualified, and was confirmed by the…”
In Re Ybarra, 781 N.W.2d 446 (Neb. 2010).
· cites it 3× “[1] Section 3-103 provides: An attorney should be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts, and others with respect to the professional duties owed to them.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-103(11) — 1 case
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-103(5) — 1 case
Rodehorst v. Gartner, 669 N.W.2d 679 (Neb. 2003).
“In that he signed the notes and is identified therein as a person undertaking to pay, Rodehorst was a “maker” of the notes as defined by § 3-103(5). However, § 3-419(a) provides that [i]f an instmment is issued for value given for the benefit of a party to the instmment…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-103(a)(5) — 1 case
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-103(a)(6) — 1 case
Emerson v. Zagurski, 531 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
“§ 3-103(a)(6). Neb. U.C.C. § 3-104 (Reissue 1992) provides that an instrument is negotiable if the following requirements are met.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-103(a)(9) — 1 case
Emerson v. Zagurski, 531 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
“§ 3-103(a)(6). Neb. U.C.C. § 3-104 (Reissue 1992) provides that an instrument is negotiable if the following requirements are met.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.