Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2201 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 30-401 to 30-406, 30-701 to 30-713, 30-2201 to 30-2902, 30-3901 to 30-3923, 30-4001 to 30-4045, 30-4201 to 30-4210 and the Public Guardianship Act shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Probate Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: Heather R. v. Mark R. (In Re K.R.), 304 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2019).
Heather R. v. Mark R. (In Re K.R.), 304 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, our analysis below is limited to whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the county court's order denying Heather's motions to terminate the guardianship and for visitation.”
In Re Guardianship of DJ, 682 N.W.2d 238 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 2× “and remove the grandparents as guardians, (3) admitting expert testimony without proper foundation, (4) admitting inadmissible hearsay, and (5) failing to maintain an impartial and unbiased role at trial.”
In re Guardianship of Eliza W., 304 Neb. 995 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 3× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Tara assigns, condensed and restated, that the district court erred (1) by failing to apply ICWA and NICWA to the guardianship proceeding and (2) by concluding that Tara was unfit to care for Eliza or that she had forfeited her right to custody.”
Ruzicka v. Ruzicka, 635 N.W.2d 528 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “The issues presented require us to examine the interplay between our intervention statutes and the Nebraska Probate Code, codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 30-2201 to 30-2902 (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
State v. Edwards, 767 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “[25] See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 30-2201 to 30-2902 (Reissue 2008).”
In Re Est. of Sehi, 772 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 30-2201 *107 (Reissue 2008) ("[s]ections 30-2201 to 30-2902 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Probate Code").”
In re Est. of Giventer, 310 Neb. 39 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 4× “As a result, he did not file any claim against the probate estate within 3 years of Pearl’s death, and any such claim filed afterward was barred. (a) Standard of Review [1-4] We first address the standard of review.”
In Re Est. of Potthoff, 733 N.W.2d 860 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “1 Appeals of matters arising under the Nebraska Probate Code, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 30-2201 through 30-2902 (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
In re Est. of Adelung, 306 Neb. 646 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “Thus, in 2008, the only forum for a challenge to an agent’s conduct was the district court.”
Kerrigan & Line v. Foote, 558 N.W.2d 837 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “*840 It found that the claims procedure set forth in § 30-2485 does not apply to a claim for administrative expenses, including attorney fees, and that the county court has jurisdiction to review the payment of attorney fees in a probate proceeding. This appeal followed.”
In Re Est. of Rosso, 701 N.W.2d 355 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Linda assigns, as summarized and restated, that the county court erred in (1) allowing Sandra to present her personal claim to the assets of the estate rather than following her fiduciary duty to claim the assets for the estate and (2) determining that (a)…”
In Re Est. of Lamplaugh, 708 N.W.2d 645 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “STANDARD OF REVIEW Appeals of matters arising under the Nebraska Probate Code, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 30-2201 through 30-2902 (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.