Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-430 (2026)

Habitat stamps; authorized agents; fees; remit

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, firm, or corporation authorized as an agent to sell the stamps under sections 37-426 to 37-433 and collect the fees therefor shall remit the fees for the stamps to the commission in the manner and at the times prescribed by the rules and regulations of the commission.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1982–1993 · leading case: Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 495 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 495 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 7× “In March 1983, the department, pursuant to the Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act (NESCA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-430 to 37-438 (Reissue 1978), directed Upper Big Blue to consult with the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (Game Commission).”

Cent. Nebraska Pub. Power & Irrigation Dist. v. John D., 413 N.W.2d 290 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “The order also stated that sufficient evidence was found to support the belief that Tri-County’s irrigation project had resulted in the formation of the underground water mound sought to be recognized as incidental water storage, that DWR had consulted with the Nebraska Game and…”

Little Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 317 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 4× “Before we turn to those matters, however, it is necessary that we first address a threshold question, not required to be addressed by us in Little Blue I, concerning the significance of the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-430 to 37-438 (Reissue 1978) and cited as The Nongame…”

Hitchcock & Red Willow Irrigation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 410 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to the Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-430 et seq. (Reissue 1984), the applicants and the director initiated consultation with the Game and Parks Commission.”

Catherland Reclamation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 433 N.W.2d 161 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “Before the Director concluded the hearing, a new issue was injected in April 1985, when Little Blue purportedly assigned its four applications to Catherland Reclamation District (Catherland).”

Basin Elec. Power Coop. v. Little Blue Nat. Resources Dist., 363 N.W.2d 500 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “2d 726 (1982) (Little Blue II), held that the Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-430 to 37-438 (Reissue 1978), should have been considered by the Department and was not.”

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 499 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1993). “The pertinent language at issue in § 37-435(3) (Reissue 1978), as in effect at the time of the applications, provided: All other state departments and agencies shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the commission, utilize their authorities in furtherance of the…”

Mountain States Legal Found. v. Hodel, 799 F.2d 1423 (10th Cir. 1986). “1985); Neb.Rev. Stat. §§ 37-430 to -438 (1984). The foregoing discussion demonstrates the fallacy in the Association’s argument that the wild horses are, in effect, instru-mentalities of the federal government whose presence constitutes a permanent governmental occupation of the…”

Twin Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 390 N.W.2d 506 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “Whether, in fact, the act would prohibit the proposed withdrawal and thereby frustrate the compact and the legal effect of such frustration is not before us.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.