Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435 (2026)

Entry permits; terms, defined

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of sections 37-434 to 37-446, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) Motor vehicle means any self-propelled vehicle of a type required to be registered and licensed for operation on the highways of the state;

(2) Permit areas means those areas, or portions of areas, of the Nebraska state park system which are defined in subdivisions (1), (2), and (3) of section 37-338 and which are designated as provided in sections 37-339 and 37-340; and

(3) Permit means motor vehicle entry permit.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1982–1996 · leading case: Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 499 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 499 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 20× “Although in our previous opinion we considered, and rejected, Big Blue’s constitutional challenges to two interbasin-transfer statutes, we did not address its challenge to a third statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435 (3) (Cum. Supp. 1992).”

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 495 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 12× “It is specified in § 37-435 and was discussed by the Supreme Court in Little Blue NRD v.”

Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 513 N.W.2d 847 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 6× “If Bishop has no power to bind CPNRD, then his testimony cannot be relied on as substantive proof that the Prairie Bend Project will not reduce the existing flows. We therefore find that the evidence cited by the director does not support his conclusion.”

Little Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 317 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 7× “” The pertinent portion of the Act, which is found in § 37-435(3), reads as follows: “The Governor shall review other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of sections 37-430 to 37-438.”

Hitchcock & Red Willow Irrigation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 410 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 46-289 (Reissue 1984), which sets forth factors to consider when evaluating an interbasin transfer of water, applicants *150 failed to meet the public interest test, most seriously falling short in addressing impacts to fish and wildlife; and (3) that applicants did not…”

Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 549 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 10× “Moreover, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435 (3) (Reissue 1993) provides, in pertinent part: All other state agencies shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the commission, utilize their *260 authorities in furtherance of the purposes of the [Nongame and Endangered Species…”

Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 512 N.W.2d 392 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 7× “Bishop’s testimony, together with exhibit 9, the Game and Parks Commission’s biological opinion concerning the Prairie Bend I project, and exhibit 18, the Planning Report/Draft Environmental Statement for the Prairie Bend unit prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior,…”

Cent. Platte Nat. Res. Dist. v. Fremont, 549 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 10× “As a part of his order, the director considered "[w]hether the Project, if approved, would jeopardize nongame endangered species or their habitat (§ 37-435)." The director concluded: Nongame and Endangered Species The Project will jeopardize the continued existence of the…”

Twin Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 390 N.W.2d 506 (Neb. 1986). “One is that all state departments and agencies must, after consulting with Game and Parks, carry out programs for the conservation of endangered species, and the second is that all state departments and agencies must not take any action that will result in jeopardizing the…”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435(3) — 7 cases

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 499 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1993). “Although in our previous opinion we considered, and rejected, Big Blue’s constitutional challenges to two interbasin-transfer statutes, we did not address its challenge to a third statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435 (3) (Cum. Supp. 1992).”

Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 495 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993). “It is specified in § 37-435 and was discussed by the Supreme Court in Little Blue NRD v.”

Little Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 317 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. 1982). “” The pertinent portion of the Act, which is found in § 37-435(3), reads as follows: “The Governor shall review other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of sections 37-430 to 37-438.”

Hitchcock & Red Willow Irrigation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 410 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 1987). “§ 46-289 (Reissue 1984), which sets forth factors to consider when evaluating an interbasin transfer of water, applicants *150 failed to meet the public interest test, most seriously falling short in addressing impacts to fish and wildlife; and (3) that applicants did not…”

Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 549 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 1996). “Moreover, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-435 (3) (Reissue 1993) provides, in pertinent part: All other state agencies shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the commission, utilize their *260 authorities in furtherance of the purposes of the [Nongame and Endangered Species…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.