Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 39
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-669.07.

Transferred to section 60-6,196.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 235 cases, 1974–2017 · leading case: State v. Michalski, 377 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Michalski, 377 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 33× “At issue in this case is the constitutionality of one of those statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Reissue 1984).”
State v. Sundling, 538 N.W.2d 749 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 22× “§ 60-6 ,196 (Reissue 1993), claims that his two prior DUI convictions prosecuted under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supps. 1990 & 1992) cannot be used to enhance the penalty for a DUI conviction under § 60-6,196.”
State v. Kubik, 456 N.W.2d 487 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 23× “Kubik, was convicted of driving under the influence of alcoholic liquor, third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Chapman, 287 N.W.2d 697 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 24× “His position is that the Legislature has established a proportionate penalty for the operation of a motor vehicle by a person who is under the influence of alcoholic liquor, third offense.”
State v. Nelson, 759 N.W.2d 260 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 13× “Nelson points to the provision of § 39-669.07 that the driver shall not drive for a period of 15 years "from the date ordered by the court and [the court] shall order that the operator's license .”
State v. Golgert, 395 N.W.2d 520 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 15× “Golgert with violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Reissue 1984), which provides in part: It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or be in the actual physical control of any motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor or of any drug or when that person…”
State v. Havorka, 355 N.W.2d 343 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 16× “1982), raises the question of whether a trial court, when placing an individual on probation for second offense drunk driving pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (2) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Hoffman, 416 N.W.2d 231 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 14× “§ 28-306 (1) and (3) (Reissue 1985), a Class IV felony; and drunk driving, a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Reissue 1984) and a misdemeanor.”
State v. Wiltshire, 491 N.W.2d 324 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 11× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.07 (2)(c) and 39-669.”
State v. Reichstein, 447 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 18× “This is an appeal from the defendant-appellant’s conviction under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (c) (Supp. 1987) of driving while his license was revoked pursuant to multiple convictions of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
State v. Ziemba, 346 N.W.2d 208 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 9× “” The district court further found that the defendant “was never advised of his right to present mitigating facts or object to the validity of the prior convictions” as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1982).”
State v. Tingle, 477 N.W.2d 544 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 10× “" Tingle was charged with DWI, second offense, a Class W misdemeanor under § 39-669.07. Her motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of her arrest was overruled.”
Show all 235 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(1) — 7 cases
State v. Havorka, 355 N.W.2d 343 (Neb. 1984). “1982), raises the question of whether a trial court, when placing an individual on probation for second offense drunk driving pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (2) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Woodfork, 478 N.W.2d 248 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Dake, 529 N.W.2d 46 (Neb. 1995).
Gausman v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 522 N.W.2d 417 (Neb. 1994).
Dannehl v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 529 N.W.2d 100 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Young, 530 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(1)(c) — 1 case
State v. Young, 530 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(2) — 10 cases
State v. Schulz, 378 N.W.2d 165 (Neb. 1985).
State v. Havorka, 355 N.W.2d 343 (Neb. 1984). “1982), raises the question of whether a trial court, when placing an individual on probation for second offense drunk driving pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (2) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Kubik, 456 N.W.2d 487 (Neb. 1990). “Kubik, was convicted of driving under the influence of alcoholic liquor, third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Supp. 1987).”
State v. Young, 544 N.W.2d 808 (Neb. 1996).
Berumen v. Casady, 515 N.W.2d 816 (Neb. 1994).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Wiltshire, 491 N.W.2d 324 (Neb. 1992). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.07 (2)(c) and 39-669.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(2)(c) — 5 cases
State v. Nelson, 759 N.W.2d 260 (Neb. 2009). “Nelson points to the provision of § 39-669.07 that the driver shall not drive for a period of 15 years "from the date ordered by the court and [the court] shall order that the operator's license .”
State v. Reimers, 496 N.W.2d 518 (Neb. 1993).
State v. Towler, 481 N.W.2d 151 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Seaman, 468 N.W.2d 121 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Flores, 767 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(3) — 21 cases
State v. Michalski, 377 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1985). “At issue in this case is the constitutionality of one of those statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Reissue 1984).”
State v. Wiltshire, 491 N.W.2d 324 (Neb. 1992). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.07 (2)(c) and 39-669.”
State v. Lynch, 394 N.W.2d 651 (Neb. 1986).
State v. Ziemba, 346 N.W.2d 208 (Neb. 1984). “” The district court further found that the defendant “was never advised of his right to present mitigating facts or object to the validity of the prior convictions” as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1982).”
State v. LeGrand, 541 N.W.2d 380 (Neb. 1995).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(4) — 2 cases
State v. Donaldson, 452 N.W.2d 531 (Neb. 1990).
Kalisek v. Abramson, 599 N.W.2d 834 (Neb. 1999).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(4)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Gerdes, 446 N.W.2d 224 (Neb. 1989).
State v. Snodgrass, 430 N.W.2d 55 (Neb. 1988).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(5) — 3 cases
State v. Woodfork, 478 N.W.2d 248 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Jones, 510 N.W.2d 404 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Lovejoy, 484 N.W.2d 451 (Neb. 1992).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(6) — 1 case
State v. Flores, 767 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(b) — 5 cases
State v. Heckman, 473 N.W.2d 416 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Estes, 472 N.W.2d 214 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Kramer, 436 N.W.2d 524 (Neb. 1989).
State v. Keller, 483 N.W.2d 126 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Contreras, 461 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 1990).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(b)(i) — 1 case
State v. Crane, 480 N.W.2d 401 (Neb. 1992).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(c) — 5 cases
State v. Reichstein, 447 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 1989). “This is an appeal from the defendant-appellant’s conviction under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (c) (Supp. 1987) of driving while his license was revoked pursuant to multiple convictions of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
State v. Bainbridge, 543 N.W.2d 154 (Neb. 1996).
State v. Schall, 449 N.W.2d 225 (Neb. 1989).
State v. Seaman, 468 N.W.2d 121 (Neb. 1991).
State v. Jenson, 464 N.W.2d 326 (Neb. 1991).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(l)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Dake, 529 N.W.2d 46 (Neb. 1995).
State v. Rodgers, 509 N.W.2d 668 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Smith, 537 N.W.2d 539 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Nelson, 509 N.W.2d 232 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Dake, 529 N.W.2d 46 (Neb. 1995).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Rodgers, 509 N.W.2d 668 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.