Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.14 (2026)
Transferred to section 60-6,204
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
39-669.14.
Transferred to section 60-6,204.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1977–1995 · leading case: State v. Orosco, 260 N.W.2d 303 (Neb. 1977).
State v. Orosco, 260 N.W.2d 303 (Neb. 1977). “Section 39-669.14, R. S. Supp., 1976, provides in part as follows.”
State v. Cash, 526 N.W.2d 447 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “) Cash bases her argument on the above statute and § 39-669.14, which reads in part as follows: Any person arrested for any offense involving the operation or actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor or drugs shall be required to…”
State v. Stein, 486 N.W.2d 921 (Neb. 1992). “The defendant argues that his blood sample was not drawn by a person authorized to do so, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.14 and 39-669.11 (Cum.”
Ruch v. Conrad, 526 N.W.2d 653 (Neb. 1995). “was reasonable,” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (Reissue 1988), provided that blood could be drawn by a “qualified technician acting at the request of a law enforcement officer,” Neb.”
Neil v. Peterson, 314 N.W.2d 275 (Neb. 1982). “This is an appeal by the director of the Department of Motor Vehicles from an order of the District Court for York County reversing an order of the director made under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.14 to 39-669.17 (Reissue 1978) revoking the motor vehicle…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.