Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 39
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (2026)

Transferred to section 60-6,208

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-669.18.

Transferred to section 60-6,208.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: Glass v. Neb. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 536 N.W.2d 344 (Neb. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Glass v. Neb. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 536 N.W.2d 344 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “" At the relevant time, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1988) provided, as Neb.”
Dozler v. Conrad, 532 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 5× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1988) states: “Any person who feels himself or herself aggrieved because of such revocation may appeal therefrom .”
Armstrong v. Higgins, 491 N.W.2d 331 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 6× “17 (Reissue 1988) and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1984).”
Ernest v. Jensen, 415 N.W.2d 121 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 4× “” Section 39-669.18 provides that in appeals from the director’s order of revocation, the person “who feels himself aggrieved because of such revocation may appeal therefrom.”
Larson v. Jensen, 424 N.W.2d 352 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “We note only that this proceeding does not involve criminal action and that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1984) provides that any person aggrieved because of an administrative revocation may appeal to the district court “where the alleged events occurred for which he was…”
MacKey v. Dir. of the Dep't of Motor Vehs., 235 N.W.2d 394 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 2× “Í943, provides for notice to the person and an opportunity to be heard prior to revocation, and provides in part: “After granting the person an opportunity to be heard on such issue, if it is not shown to the director that such refusal to submit to such chemical test was…”
Ruch v. Conrad, 526 N.W.2d 653 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “As provided in then Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1988), Ruch instituted his appeal from the director’s order to the district court on April 22, 1992, under the Administrative Procedure Act, Neb.”
Gausman v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 522 N.W.2d 417 (Neb. 1994). “If the driver’s license is revoked, then “ [a]ny person who feels himself or herself aggrieved because of such revocation may appeal therefrom to the district court of the county where the alleged events occurred .”
Jackson v. Jensen, 407 N.W.2d 758 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1984) of the Nebraska implied consent law permits any person who feels aggrieved because of a revocation of driving privileges to appeal to the district court of the county where the alleged events occurred *672 for which the operator was…”
Dannehl v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 529 N.W.2d 100 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “If the driver’s license is revoked, then “[a]ny person who feels himself or herself aggrieved because of such revocation may appeal therefrom to the district court of the county where the alleged events occurred .”
Glass v. Nebraska Dep't of Motor Vehs., 536 N.W.2d 344 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “” At the relevant time, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.18 (Reissue 1988) provided, as Neb.”
Garcia v. Nebraska Dept. of Motor Vehs., 533 N.W.2d 911 (Neb. 1995). “15 through § 39-669.18 (Cum. Supp. 1992). Accordingly, the arresting officer took Garcia’s driver’s license, and Garcia was issued a temporary license which was valid for 30 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.