Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-355 (2026)

Defendant; proper service or appearance

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No marriage shall be dissolved or legal separation decreed unless the defendant has been properly served with process or entered an appearance in the case.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2020 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 2× “30 Indeed, in Tejral,31 upon which Fangmeier relies, this court focused upon Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-355 (Reissue 1984) and not upon § 25-1308.”
Christine W. v. Trevor W., 928 N.W.2d 398 (Neb. 2019). “See § 42-355. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-245 to 43-2,129 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Dycus v. Dycus, 949 N.W.2d 357 (Neb. 2020). “In any event, we have already held, in Buchholz v. Buchholz 37 that the Nebraska no-fault divorce statutes do not deprive defendants of a substantial vested property interest, as “marriage is not an ordinary civil contract.”
Tejral v. Tejral, 369 N.W.2d 359 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 4× “On the other hand, petitioner has complied fully with the provisions as to service of process set out in Neb.Rev.Stat. § 42-355 (Reissue 1984) in that respondent was served personally with a summons which notified her that she was required to file a response within 30 days or…”
Christine W. v. Trevor W., 303 Neb. 245 (Neb. 2019). “22 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-245 to 43-2,129 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.