Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 42
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-701 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 42-701 to 42-751.01 shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1998–2018 · leading case: Hamilton v. Foster, 620 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hamilton v. Foster, 620 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 3× “§§ 43-1201 to 43-1225 (Reissue 1998), and the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-701 to 42-7,105 (Reissue 1998).”
Groseth v. Groseth, 600 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 3× “STANDARD OF REVIEW This case calls for an interpretation of certain provisions in the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-701 through 42-751 (Reissue 1993 & Cum.”
Willers Ex Rel. Powell v. Willers, 587 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 4× “Several Nebraska statutes historically pertaining to child support fail to indicate one way or the other whether retroactive child support payments should be permitted or denied.”
Palagi v. Palagi, 627 N.W.2d 765 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “” While this statute is part of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act *235 (UIFSA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-701 et seq. (Reissue 1998), which we later hold to be not determinative, it nonetheless expresses the policy that Nebraska courts determine support matters when the…”
Clark v. Clark, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 289 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “This case involves a request by a Nebraska resident to have a Nebraska court determine which of two child support orders, issued in different states, is the "controlling" child support order.”
In Re McKain, 325 B.R. 842 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “The Nebraska legislature has adopted the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA” or “the Act”), Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 42-701 to -751 (Lexis Cum.”
Lamb v. Lamb, 707 N.W.2d 423 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Thus, we address the modification of the Wyoming child support order under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-701 to 42-751 (Reissue 2004).”
Harvey v. Harvey, 575 N.W.2d 167 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “His petition alleged that the child support order had been sent by Cynthia to his employer pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-701 et seq. (Reissue 1993), but that the Wisconsin court “did not and does not have personal jurisdiction” over…”
Ostermiller v. Spurr, 968 P.2d 940 (Wyo. 1998). · cites it 2× “§§ 20-4-139 through 20-4-189 (1997) and Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 42-701 through 42-751 (1997)), forwarded to Wyoming's office of child support services *942 a verified petition for establishment of paternity, order of support, and reimbursement of medical expenses.”
Trogdon v. Trogdon, 780 N.W.2d 45 (Neb. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “On March 10, 2008, Suzanne initiated a proceeding in the district court to register the California support orders pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, Neb.Rev. Stat. §§ 42-701 through 42-751 (Reissue 2008).”
Clark v. Clark, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 289 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “As framed by the amended complaint, the case fits squarely within the terms of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-701 to 42-751.01 (Reissue 2016).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.