Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-747.01 (2026)

Jurisdiction to modify child support order of another state when individual parties reside in this state

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If all of the parties who are individuals reside in this state and the child does not reside in the issuing state, a tribunal of this state has jurisdiction to enforce and to modify the issuing state's child support order in a proceeding to register that order.

(b) A tribunal of this state exercising jurisdiction under this section shall apply the provisions of sections 42-701 to 42-713.02 and 42-736 to 42-747.04 and the procedural and substantive law of this state to the enforcement or modification proceeding. Sections 42-714 to 42-735 and 42-748.01 to 42-750 do not apply.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2008 · leading case: Groseth v. Groseth, 600 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Groseth v. Groseth, 600 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 10× “) Finally, § 42-746 (Reissue 1998) provides: (a) After a child support order issued in another state has been registered in this state, the responding tribunal of this state may modify that order only if section 42-747.01 does not apply and after notice and hearing it finds…”

Hamilton v. Foster, 620 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 7× “However, the facts as pled by Hamilton show that § 42-747.01 is not applicable in this case.”

Wills v. Wills, 745 N.W.2d 924 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 12× “§ 42-746 (Reissue 2004) did not apply because Neb. Rev.Stat. § 42-747.01 (Reissue 2004) was applicable.”

In Re McKain, 325 B.R. 842 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “Neb.Rev. Stat. § 42-747.01. This is because enforcement and modification of a child-support order when all parties reside in one state is not a matter of interstate concern.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-747.01(a) — 1 case

Hamilton v. Foster, 620 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2000). “However, the facts as pled by Hamilton show that § 42-747.01 is not applicable in this case.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-747.01(b) — 1 case

Wills v. Wills, 745 N.W.2d 924 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 42-746 (Reissue 2004) did not apply because Neb. Rev.Stat. § 42-747.01 (Reissue 2004) was applicable.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.