Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252 (2026)

Registration of child custody determination

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A child custody determination issued by a court of another state may be registered in this state, with or without a simultaneous request for enforcement, by sending to the district court in this state:

(1) a letter or other document requesting registration;

(2) two copies, including one certified copy, of the determination sought to be registered, and a statement under penalty of perjury that to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person seeking registration the order has not been modified; and

(3) except as otherwise provided in section 43-1246, the name and address of the person seeking registration and any parent or person acting as a parent who has been awarded custody or visitation in the child custody determination sought to be registered.

(b) On receipt of the documents required by subsection (a) of this section, the registering court shall:

(1) cause the determination to be filed as a foreign judgment, together with one copy of any accompanying documents and information, regardless of their form; and

(2) serve notice upon the persons named pursuant to subdivision (a)(3) of this section and provide them with an opportunity to contest the registration in accordance with this section.

(c) The notice required by subdivision (b)(2) of this section shall state that:

(1) a registered determination is enforceable as of the date of the registration in the same manner as a determination issued by a court of this state;

(2) a hearing to contest the validity of the registered determination shall be requested within twenty days after service of notice; and

(3) failure to contest the registration will result in confirmation of the child custody determination and preclude further contest of that determination with respect to any matter that could have been asserted.

(d) A person seeking to contest the validity of a registered order shall request a hearing within twenty days after service of the notice. At that hearing, the court shall confirm the registered order unless the person contesting registration establishes that:

(1) the issuing court did not have jurisdiction under sections 43-1238 to 43-1247;

(2) the child custody determination sought to be registered has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court having jurisdiction to do so under such sections; or

(3) the person contesting registration was entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of section 43-1233, in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which registration is sought.

(e) If a timely request for a hearing to contest the validity of the registration is not made, the registration is confirmed as a matter of law and the person requesting registration and all persons served shall be notified of the confirmation.

(f) Confirmation of a registered order, whether by operation of law or after notice and hearing, precludes further contest of the order with respect to any matter that could have been asserted at the time of registration.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2022 · leading case: Watson v. Watson, 724 N.W.2d 24 (Neb. 2006).
Watson v. Watson, 724 N.W.2d 24 (Neb. 2006). “Accord § 43-1252. The uncontested registration of a Nebraska child custody determination in Maryland authorizes the Maryland court to enforce the Nebraska order.”
Ekaterina Nicholaevna Pokrovskaya, a/k/a Yekaterina Pokrovskaia v. Eric Van Genderen Sr., 2021 WY 68 (Wyo. 2021). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252 (2007). Once registered, the order is enforceable “in the same manner as a determination issued by a court of [Nebraska].”
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 8× “On August 15, 2018, about 2 months after the Texas order was issued, Hollomon sought to register the order in the district court for Seward County pursuant to § 43-1252. She filed a certified copy of the Texas order, accompanied by her affidavit requesting registration of the…”
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 11× “When the registration pro- cedure of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252 (Reissue 2016) has been followed and the registration is either not contested or, after a hearing none of the grounds under § 43-1252(d) have been established, the registering court shall confirm the registered order.”
Rothwell v. Schneider (Neb. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “On June 12, 2019, Rothwell petitioned the district court for Holt County, Nebraska, to register the final order and order nunc pro tunc as a foreign custody and support decree pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-1252 and 42-744 (Reissue 2016).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252(c) — 2 cases
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). “On August 15, 2018, about 2 months after the Texas order was issued, Hollomon sought to register the order in the district court for Seward County pursuant to § 43-1252. She filed a certified copy of the Texas order, accompanied by her affidavit requesting registration of the…”
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). “When the registration pro- cedure of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252 (Reissue 2016) has been followed and the registration is either not contested or, after a hearing none of the grounds under § 43-1252(d) have been established, the registering court shall confirm the registered order.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252(d) — 2 cases
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). “On August 15, 2018, about 2 months after the Texas order was issued, Hollomon sought to register the order in the district court for Seward County pursuant to § 43-1252. She filed a certified copy of the Texas order, accompanied by her affidavit requesting registration of the…”
Hollomon v. Taylor, 303 Neb. 121 (Neb. 2019). “When the registration pro- cedure of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1252 (Reissue 2016) has been followed and the registration is either not contested or, after a hearing none of the grounds under § 43-1252(d) have been established, the registering court shall confirm the registered order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.