Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 43
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-260.02 (2026)

Juvenile pretrial diversion program; authorized

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A county attorney may establish a juvenile pretrial diversion program with the concurrence of the county board. If the county is part of a multicounty juvenile services plan under the Nebraska County Juvenile Services Plan Act, the county attorney may establish a juvenile pretrial diversion program in conjunction with other county attorneys from counties that are a part of such multicounty plan. A city attorney may establish a juvenile pretrial diversion program with the concurrence of the governing body of the city. Such programs shall meet the requirements of sections 43-260.02 to 43-260.07.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: State v. Leroux, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 76 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Leroux, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 76 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “(c) Neutral Factors The district court found four of the factors set forth in § 43-276(1) to be either inapplicable or incapable of being determined at this stage of the proceedings, namely: (c) motivation for the commission of the offense, (j) whether the victim agrees to…”
State v. Hunt, 299 Neb. 573 (Neb. 2018). “juvenile and the security of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim agrees to…”
State v. Tyler P., 299 Neb. 959 (Neb. 2018). “juvenile and the security of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim agrees to…”
State v. Goodwin, 774 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2009). “uvenile and the security of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (9) whether the victim agrees to…”
State v. Esai P., 28 Neb. Ct. App. 226 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). “of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extend- ing beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the vic- tim or juvenile agree to participate in…”
State v. Jeremiah T., 319 Neb. 133 (Neb. 2025). “of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extend- ing beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim or juvenile agree to participate in…”
In re Interest of William E., 29 Neb. Ct. App. 44 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). “The remaining factors that we have not discussed are not present and are neutral: “whether the victim or juvenile agree to participate in restorative justice,” see § 43-276(1)(j); “whether there is a juvenile pretrial diversion program established pursu- ant to sections…”
State v. Lu, 33 Neb. Ct. App. 45 (Neb. Ct. App. 2024). “of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extend- ing beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim or juvenile agree to participate in…”
State v. Blimling, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 693 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). “ile and the security of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim agrees to participate…”
State v. Moreno, 28 Neb. Ct. App. 581 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). “of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extend- ing beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim or juvenile agree to participate in…”
State v. Comer, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 270 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). “ile and the security of the public may require that the juvenile continue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the available alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim agrees to participate…”
State v. Burris, 30 Neb. Ct. App. 109 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). “of the public may require that the juvenile con- tinue in secure detention or under supervision for a period extending beyond his or her minority and, if so, the avail- able alternatives best suited to this purpose; (j) whether the victim or juvenile agree to participate in…”
Show all 48 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.