Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2820 (2026)
Action based on failure to obtain informed consent; burden of proof
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Before the plaintiff may recover any damages in any action based on failure to obtain informed consent, it shall be established by a preponderance of the evidence that a reasonably prudent person in the plaintiff's position would not have undergone the treatment had he or she been properly informed and that the lack of informed consent was the proximate cause of the injury and damages claimed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Curran v. Buser, 711 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 2006).
Curran v. Buser, 711 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 2006). “*339 Moreover, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2820 (Reissue 2004) provides the burden of proof in an action based on failure to obtain informed consent.”
Smith v. Weaver, 407 N.W.2d 174 (Neb. 1987). “Quite to the contrary, I believe that by adopting Neb.Rev.Stat. § 44-2820 (Reissue 1984), the Legislature of the State of Nebraska has committed this state to the "material risk" theory.”
Jones v. Malloy, 412 N.W.2d 837 (Neb. 1987). “§ 44-2820. At trial plaintiff presented expert chiropractic evidence from Dr.”
Pflueger-Jaems v. Pope Paul VI Inst. Physicians (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2820 (Reissue 2010) requires a plaintiff claiming lack of informed consent to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a reasonably prudent person in the plaintiff’s position would not have undergone the treatment had he or she been properly informed…”
Nienhuser v. MacMillan (Neb. Ct. App. 2025). “Moreover, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2820 (Reissue 2021) provides the burden of proof in an action based on failure to obtain informed consent.”
Jim P. Benge, M.D. & Kelsey-Seybold Med. Grp. PLLC v. Lauren Williams (Tex. App. 2015). “[*339] Moreover, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2820 (Reissue 2004) provides the burden of proof in an action based on failure to obtain informed consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.