Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-379 (2026)

Transferred to section 44-522

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

44-379.

Transferred to section 44-522.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1961–2000 · leading case: Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 480 N.W.2d 192 (Neb. 1992).
Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 480 N.W.2d 192 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-379 (Reissue 1984). The *20 parties to an insurance contract may contract for any lawful coverage, and the insurer may limit its liability and impose restrictions and conditions upon its obligation under the contract not inconsistent with public policy…”
Struve Enter., Inc. v. Travelers Ins., 500 N.W.2d 580 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 3× “Based upon the stipulated record, the district court found that Travelers had canceled Struve’s workers’ compensation insurance policy without giving Struve the notice required by *519 the policy and by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-379 (Reissue 1988). The court found that, therefore,…”
Brouilette v. DBV Enter., Inc., 619 N.W.2d 482 (Neb. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “The relevant statute before the court in Struve was Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-379 (Reissue 1988), applicable to workers’ compensation policies at that time, which then provided in relevant part that “the insurer shall give the insured sixty days’ written notice prior to cancellation…”
Hansen v. U.S.A.A. Cas. Ins., 291 N.W.2d 715 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 2× “The company points to both the language of the policy itself and to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-379 (Reissue 1978). See, also, Neb.”
Hansen v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 291 N.W.2d 715 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 2× “The company points to both the language of the policy itself and to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 44-379 (Reissue 1978). See, also, Neb.”
Sculley v. Sullivan, 108 N.W.2d 82 (Neb. 1961). · cites it 2× “The only question for determination is that of whether or not the policy of insurance was canceled by the notice which has been described, or by the notice coupled with the acts of the parties and of Norsworthy, who *798 acted as agent for the appellee at the time of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.