Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-226.01 (2026)
Application for recognition of incidental underground water storage; procedure
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person having an approved perfected appropriation may file with the Chief Water Officer an application for recognition of incidental underground water storage associated with such appropriation on a form prescribed and furnished by the Chief Water Officer without cost. Upon receipt of an application, the Chief Water Officer shall proceed in accordance with rules and regulations adopted and promulgated by the Chief Water Officer.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1987–1998 · leading case: Cent. Nebraska Pub. Power & Irrigation Dist. v. John D., 413 N.W.2d 290 (Neb. 1987).
Cent. Nebraska Pub. Power & Irrigation Dist. v. John D., 413 N.W.2d 290 (Neb. 1987). “At that time Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-226.01 (Reissue 1984) *596 provided as follows: Any person having an approved perfected appropriation may file with the department an application for recognition of incidental underground water storage associated with such appropriation, and for…”
In Re Application A-16642, 463 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 1990). “Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 46-226.01, 46-226.02, and 46-297 (Reissue 1988) provide procedures for the recognition of such rights.”
Willers Ex Rel. Powell v. Willers, 587 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1998). “In re Application U-2 involved an application for recognition of underground water storage pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-226.01 (Reissue 1984).”
Bamford v. Upper Repub. Nat. Resources Dist., 512 N.W.2d 642 (Neb. 1994). “argue that § 46-226.01 is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority and that it does not contain adequate legal standards to govern the director’s review of an application.”
Nebraska Game & Parks Comm'n v. 25 Corp., 463 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 1990). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 46-226.01 , 46-226.02, and 46-297 (Reissue 1988) provide procedures for the recognition of such rights.”
Bamford v. Upper Repub. Nat. Res. D., 512 N.W.2d 642 (Neb. 1994). “argue that § 46-226.01 is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority and that it does not contain adequate legal standards to govern the director's review of an application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.