Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 (2026)

Action in district court; deadline; notice by commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The deadline for filing an action directly in the district court is ninety days after the complainant receives notice of the last action the commission will take on the complaint or charge. When entering the last action on the complaint or charge, the commission shall issue written notice of such ninety-day deadline to the complainant by certified mail, return receipt requested. The last action on the complaint or charge includes the issuance of the final order after hearing, the determination of reasonable cause or no reasonable cause, and any other administrative action which ends the commission's involvement with the complaint or charge.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: Knapp v. Ruser, 145 F. Supp. 3d 846 (D. Neb. 2015).
Knapp v. Ruser, 145 F. Supp. 3d 846 (D. Neb. 2015). · cites it 2× “that her state law claims are authorized pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-1120.01 and 48-1223, these statutory waivers of sovereign immunity lack á clear, unequivocal waiver as applied to her claim of a violation of public policy.”
Hill v. AMMC, Inc., 300 Neb. 412 (Neb. 2018). “CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the wrongful discharge claim asserted in Hill's 2017 complaint is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. We therefore affirm the district court's dismissal.”
Adams v. Tenneco Auto. Operating Co., Inc., 358 F. Supp. 2d 878 (D. Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “, within 300 days of the alleged discrimination), there is no other statute of limitations running against that claim while it is in the hands of the NEOC.”
Snowden v. Quad Packaging, Inc. (D. Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 12117 (a)(ADA); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 (Westlaw 2019).”
Bahshoota v. Nelnet, Inc. (D. Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 . 860, 113 S.”
Watson v. Kelloggs Co. (D. Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “The NFEPA also requires exhaustion of administrative remedies and contains a 90-day limitations period for filing suit, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 , which is not tolled pending issuance of the EEOC’s right-to-sue notice.”
Evans v. Mosaic (D. Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 2000e-5(f)(1) (Title VII); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 (NFEPA); see also Fort Bend Cty.”
Evans v. Mosaic (D. Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 2000e-5(f)(1) (Title VII); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 (NFEPA); see also Fort Bend Cty.”
Carter v. Tomlinson Restaurant Grp., LLC (D. Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “If the EEOC/NEOC determines that there is no reasonable cause, the agency will then issue the charging party a right-to-sue notice.”
Hill v. Life Line Screening of Am., LLC (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “" See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 . The complication here is that Hill has not provided a copy of that letter, nor did she specifically pled when she received it.”
Carter v. Tomlinson Restaurant Grp., LLC (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “§ 2000e-5(f)(1) (Title VII); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1120.01 (NFEPA). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint alleges that he was terminated on April 19, 2020, from his position with Tomlinson Restaurant Group, LLC, d/b/a Hog Wild Pit Bar-B-Q, after his coworker, Defendant Grant, became…”
Meints v. City of Wymore, Nebraska (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “Section 48-1120.01 provides that a Fair Employment Practices Act complaint alleging an unlawful employment practice is to be filed in the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.