Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (2026)

Compensation court; rules and regulations; procedures for adoption; powers and duties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court, by a majority vote of the judges thereof, may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act, except that rules and regulations relating to the compensation court's adjudicatory function shall become effective only upon approval of the Supreme Court.

(2) No rule or regulation to carry out the act shall be adopted and promulgated except after public hearing conducted by a quorum of the compensation court on the question of adopting and promulgating such rule or regulation. Notice of such hearing shall be given at least fourteen days prior thereto by publication in a newspaper having general circulation in the state. Draft copies of all such rules and regulations shall be available to the public at the compensation court at the time of giving notice.

(3) The administrator of the compensation court shall establish and maintain a list of subscribers who wish to receive notice of public hearing on the question of adopting and promulgating any rule or regulation and shall provide notice to such subscribers. The administrator shall distribute a current copy of existing rules and regulations and any updates to those rules and regulations once adopted to the State Library and to each county law library or the largest public library in each county.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1982–2016 · leading case: Grady v. Visiting Nurse Ass'n, 524 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1994).
Grady v. Visiting Nurse Ass'n, 524 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 10× “1992) contains the following provision: The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act and shall administer and enforce all of the…”
Cruz-Morales v. Swift Beef Co., 746 N.W.2d 698 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 5× “Under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 48-163 (Cum.Supp. 2006), the compensation court "may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act.”
Interiano-Lopez v. Tyson Fresh Meats, 883 N.W.2d 676 (Neb. 2016). “’”9 We further explained that if general civil procedure statutes “were deemed appli- cable in the Workers’ Compensation Court unless specifi- cally excluded, then §§ 48-163 and 48-168, which specifically exempt that court from formal rules of procedure, would be without meaning.”
Behrens v. Am. Stores Packing Co., 421 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (Cum. Supp. 1986) provides that the Workers’ Compensation Court may adopt all reasonable rules necessary for carrying out the intent and purposes of Neb.”
Phillips v. Monroe Auto Equip. Co., 558 N.W.2d 799 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (1) (Reissue 1993) provides: The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court, by a majority vote of the judges thereof, may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers’…”
Stewart v. Amigo's Restaurant, 480 N.W.2d 211 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “§ 48-163 (Reissue 1988) provides in part: The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act and shall administer and enforce all of…”
Stansbury v. HEP, INC., 539 N.W.2d 28 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “” Irrespective of whether this rule evidences an intent on the part of the compensation court to treat transitional cases differently, the legal reality is that while the compensation court is entitled to adopt and promulgate rules necessary for carrying out the intent of the…”
Robbins v. Neth, 722 N.W.2d 76 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “42E (1995), which provides: "If an employer received notice of injury before January 1, 1994, the employee may continue to receive vocational rehabilitation services from the vocational rehabilitation counselor selected prior to that date." Irrespective of whether this rule…”
Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Div. of ConAgra, 597 N.W.2d 394 (Neb. 1999). “§ 48-156 (Reissue 1998), which provides: *320 A majority of the judges of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court shall constitute a quorum to adopt rules and regulations, as provided in sections 48-163 and 48-164, to transact business, except when the statute or a rule adopted…”
State v. Soto, 659 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “We also note Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (1) (Cum. Supp. 2002), which provides: *676 The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court, by a majority vote of the judges thereof, may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose…”
Buckingham v. Creighton Univ., 539 N.W.2d 646 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (Reissue 1993). Additionally, the compensation court is authorized to require production of books or papers and to expedite the hearing of a disputed case.”
Harpham v. Gen. Cas. Co., 441 N.W.2d 600 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “§ 48-163 (Reissue 1988) provides in relevant part: The compensation court or any judge thereof may, upon the motion of either party or upon its or his or her own motion, require the production of any books, papers, payrolls, medical reports, X-rays, photographs or plates, or any…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163(1) — 1 case
Phillips v. Monroe Auto Equip. Co., 558 N.W.2d 799 (Neb. 1997). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-163 (1) (Reissue 1993) provides: The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court, by a majority vote of the judges thereof, may adopt and promulgate all reasonable rules and regulations necessary for carrying out the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Workers’…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.