Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-601 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 48-601 to 48-683 shall be known and may be cited as the Employment Security Law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1949–2024 · leading case: Omaha World-Herald v. Dernier, 570 N.W.2d 508 (Neb. 1997).
Omaha World-Herald v. Dernier, 570 N.W.2d 508 (Neb. 1997). “for wages or under any contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied.”
Sorensen v. Meyer, 370 N.W.2d 173 (Neb. 1985). “A brief overview of the Employment Security Law, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-601 et seq. (Reissue 1984), is a prerequisite to an understanding of the issue presented by this case.”
Nebco, Inc. v. Murphy, 784 N.W.2d 447 (Neb. 2010). “Under § 48-628(2) of Nebraska's Employment Security Law, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 48-601 et seq. (Reissue 2004 & Cum.”
Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Polinsky, 530 N.W.2d 637 (Neb. 1995). “INTRODUCTION This case involves the issue of whether an employee is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits under the Employment Security Law, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-601 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
Snyder Indus., Inc. v. Otto, 321 N.W.2d 77 (Neb. 1982). “Otto filed a claim for unemployment compensation benefits under the Nebraska Employment Security Law, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-601 et seq. (Reissue 1978).”
Great Plains Container Co. v. Hiatt, 407 N.W.2d 166 (Neb. 1987). “§§ 48-601 to 48-669 (Reissue 1984). The district court for Adams County affirmed.”
Nuss v. Sorensen, 358 N.W.2d 752 (Neb. 1984). “2d 548, 551 (1983): We believe that a more appropriate reading of both the language of § 48-628 and the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Employment Security Law (Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 48-601 to 48-669) is to interpret § 48-628(a) such that one is disqualified for benefits if, by…”
Gilbert v. Hanlon, 335 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1983). “We believe that such an interpretation would be wholly inappropriate. We believe that a more appropriate reading of both the language of § 48-628 and the intent and purpose of the Nebraska Employment Security Law ( Neb.”
Tuma v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 409 N.W.2d 306 (Neb. 1987). “The tribunal held that claimant's conduct constituted misconduct within the meaning of the Nebraska Employment Security Law, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-601 to 48-669 (Reissue 1984), sufficient to bar claimant from receiving unemployment compensation benefits until after a waiting…”
Wright v. Sw. Airlines Co., 315 Neb. 911 (Neb. 2024). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-601 to 48-683 (Reissue 2021).”
Sch. Dist. No. 21, Morrill Cnty. v. Ochoa, 342 N.W.2d 665 (Neb. 1984). “This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Morrill County involving a claim for unemployment benefits under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-601 et seq. (Reissue 1978).”
Smith v. Sorensen, 386 N.W.2d 5 (Neb. 1986). “It appears to be the general rule that state legislatures possess the power to determine procedures to be followed in appealing actions arising under unemployment laws. See 81 C.J.S. Social Security § 157 (1977).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.