Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 57-1306 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

57-1306.

Transferred to section 66-1863.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2020 · leading case: In Re Application of Metro. Util. Dist., 704 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Application of Metro. Util. Dist., 704 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 6× “MUD argues, however, that the Commission lacks jurisdiction because of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 57-1306 (Reissue 2004). We determine that the newer and more specific statutes, §§ 66-1848 and 66-1849, apply and give the Commission jurisdiction over MUD's application.”

Metro. Utils. Dist. v. Aquila, Inc., 712 N.W.2d 280 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 5× “Under § 57-1306, the PSC is given power to determine whether an extension or enlargement is in the public interest: If the investor-owned natural gas utility or the metropolitan utilities district disagrees with a determination by an investor-owned natural gas utility or a…”

Omaha Expo. & Racing v. Nebraska State Racing Comm., 307 Neb. 172 (Neb. 2020). “52 These statutes specified that no utility could extend or enlarge its natural gas mains or services unless it was in the public interest and that, if a complaint was brought alleging an action was not in the public interest, the PSC was instructed to con- sider the question of…”

City of Omaha v. C.A. Howell, Inc., 832 N.W.2d 30 (Neb. Ct. App. 2013). “§§ 57-1301 to 57-1307 (Reissue 2004), but that those statutes limited the PSC’s role by specifically including a provision in § 57-1306 stating that the PSC “shall have no jurisdiction over a metro- politan utilities district or natural gas utility beyond the deter- mination of…”

Metro. Utils. Dist. v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 704 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 6× “MUD argues, however, that the Commission lacks jurisdiction because of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 57-1306 (Reissue 2004).”

McDougle v. State ex rel. Bruning, 289 Neb. 19 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “§§ 57-1301 to 57-1307 (Reissue 2004).27 We observed that although the commission’s jurisdiction did extend to §§ 57-1301 to 57-1307, the commission’s statutory powers in that role are limited.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.