Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (2026)
Body, defined
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Body means that portion of a vehicle which determines its shape and appearance and is attached to the frame. Body does not include the box or bed of a truck.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases, 1945–2019 · leading case: Loyal's Auto Exch., Inc. v. Munch, 45 N.W.2d 913 (Neb. 1951).
Loyal's Auto Exch., Inc. v. Munch, 45 N.W.2d 913 (Neb. 1951). “" As amended, section 60-105, R.S.Supp., 1949, so far as here material, provides: "No person * * * acquiring a motor vehicle * * * from the owner thereof * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor vehicle * * * until he shall have had issued to…”
Weiss v. Union Ins., 276 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1979). “Section 60-105 (1), R. R. S. 1943, states in pertinent part: “No person .”
Alford v. Neal, 425 N.W.2d 325 (Neb. 1988). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (1) (Reissue 1984) of the Nebraska certificate of title act states: No person .”
Dugdale of Nebraska, Inc. v. First State Bank, 420 N.W.2d 273 (Neb. 1988). “The court relied upon Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (Reissue 1984), which states in relevant part as follows: No person .”
First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Ohio Cas. Ins., 244 N.W.2d 209 (Neb. 1976). “The pertinent statute, section 60-105, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “(1) No person, except as provided in section 60-110, acquiring a motor vehicle, commercial trailer, semitrailer, or cabin trailer from the owner thereof, whether such owner be a manufacturer, importer,…”
McCoolidge v. Oyvetsky, 874 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2016). “955 has had delivered to him or her physical possession of such vehicle and (a) a certificate of title or a duly executed manufacturer’s or importer’s certificate with such assignments as are necessary to show title in the purchaser, (b) a written instrument as required by sec-…”
Turpin v. Stand. Reliance Ins. Co.(Mut.), 99 N.W.2d 26 (Neb. 1959). “1943, provides in part: “No person, * * * shall sell or otherwise dispose of a motor vehicle, * * * without delivering to the purchaser or transferee thereof a certificate of title with such assignment thereon as may be necessary to show title in the purchaser, * * Section…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Drawbaugh, 65 N.W.2d 542 (Neb. 1954). “" Section 60-105, R.R.S.1943, provides in part: "No person, * * * acquiring a motor vehicle, * * * from the owner thereof, * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor vehicle, * * * until he shall have had issued to him a certificate of title to…”
Worley v. Schaefer, 423 N.W.2d 748 (Neb. 1988). “In Fitzgerald , we said: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (1) (Reissue 1978) provides in part as follows: “No person.”
First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Provident Fin. Co., 125 N.W.2d 78 (Neb. 1963). “Section 60-105, R.S.Supp., 1961, provides in part: "No court in any case at law or in equity shall recognize the right, title, claim, or interest of any person in or to any motor vehicle, * * * sold or disposed of, or mortgaged or encumbered, unless evidenced by a certificate of…”
Cornhusker Bank of Omaha v. Mcnamara, 288 N.W.2d 287 (Neb. 1980). “1943, reads in part: “(1) No person * * * acquiring a motor vehicle * * * from the owner thereof * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor *507 vehicle * * * until he shall have had delivered to him physical possession of such motor vehicle * *…”
Wolfson Car Leasing Co., Inc. v. Weberg, 264 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 1978). “The defendants also ask us to hold that section 60-105, R. R. S. 1943, of the Certificate of Title Act, has no application in determining the defendants’ claim.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105(1) — 5 cases
Weiss v. Union Ins., 276 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1979). “Section 60-105 (1), R. R. S. 1943, states in pertinent part: “No person .”
Hanson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 486 N.W.2d 223 (Neb. 1992).
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Royal Ins. Co., 382 N.W.2d 2 (Neb. 1986).
Rose v. US Nat. Bank of Omaha, 352 N.W.2d 594 (Neb. 1984).
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Royal Ins. Co. of Am., 382 N.W.2d 2 (Neb. 1986).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.