Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (2026)

Body, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Body means that portion of a vehicle which determines its shape and appearance and is attached to the frame. Body does not include the box or bed of a truck.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases, 1945–2019 · leading case: Loyal's Auto Exch., Inc. v. Munch, 45 N.W.2d 913 (Neb. 1951).
Loyal's Auto Exch., Inc. v. Munch, 45 N.W.2d 913 (Neb. 1951). · cites it 28× “" As amended, section 60-105, R.S.Supp., 1949, so far as here material, provides: "No person * * * acquiring a motor vehicle * * * from the owner thereof * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor vehicle * * * until he shall have had issued to…”
Weiss v. Union Ins., 276 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 6× “Section 60-105 (1), R. R. S. 1943, states in pertinent part: “No person .”
Alford v. Neal, 425 N.W.2d 325 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 7× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (1) (Reissue 1984) of the Nebraska certificate of title act states: No person .”
Dugdale of Nebraska, Inc. v. First State Bank, 420 N.W.2d 273 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 6× “The court relied upon Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (Reissue 1984), which states in relevant part as follows: No person .”
First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Ohio Cas. Ins., 244 N.W.2d 209 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 6× “The pertinent statute, section 60-105, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “(1) No person, except as provided in section 60-110, acquiring a motor vehicle, commercial trailer, semitrailer, or cabin trailer from the owner thereof, whether such owner be a manufacturer, importer,…”
McCoolidge v. Oyvetsky, 874 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “955 has had delivered to him or her physical possession of such vehicle and (a) a certificate of title or a duly executed manufacturer’s or importer’s certificate with such assignments as are necessary to show title in the purchaser, (b) a written instrument as required by sec-…”
Turpin v. Stand. Reliance Ins. Co.(Mut.), 99 N.W.2d 26 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 6× “1943, provides in part: “No person, * * * shall sell or otherwise dispose of a motor vehicle, * * * without delivering to the purchaser or transferee thereof a certificate of title with such assignment thereon as may be necessary to show title in the purchaser, * * Section…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Drawbaugh, 65 N.W.2d 542 (Neb. 1954). · cites it 32× “" Section 60-105, R.R.S.1943, provides in part: "No person, * * * acquiring a motor vehicle, * * * from the owner thereof, * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor vehicle, * * * until he shall have had issued to him a certificate of title to…”
Worley v. Schaefer, 423 N.W.2d 748 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 10× “In Fitzgerald , we said: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105 (1) (Reissue 1978) provides in part as follows: “No person.”
First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Provident Fin. Co., 125 N.W.2d 78 (Neb. 1963). · cites it 8× “Section 60-105, R.S.Supp., 1961, provides in part: "No court in any case at law or in equity shall recognize the right, title, claim, or interest of any person in or to any motor vehicle, * * * sold or disposed of, or mortgaged or encumbered, unless evidenced by a certificate of…”
Cornhusker Bank of Omaha v. Mcnamara, 288 N.W.2d 287 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 6× “1943, reads in part: “(1) No person * * * acquiring a motor vehicle * * * from the owner thereof * * * shall acquire any right, title, claim, or interest in or to such motor *507 vehicle * * * until he shall have had delivered to him physical possession of such motor vehicle * *…”
Wolfson Car Leasing Co., Inc. v. Weberg, 264 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 4× “The defendants also ask us to hold that section 60-105, R. R. S. 1943, of the Certificate of Title Act, has no application in determining the defendants’ claim.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-105(1) — 5 cases
Weiss v. Union Ins., 276 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1979). “Section 60-105 (1), R. R. S. 1943, states in pertinent part: “No person .”
Hanson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 486 N.W.2d 223 (Neb. 1992).
Rose v. US Nat. Bank of Omaha, 352 N.W.2d 594 (Neb. 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.