Such motor vehicle liability policy shall (1) designate by explicit description or by appropriate reference all motor vehicles with respect to which coverage is thereby to be granted and (2) insure the person named therein and any other person, as insured, using any such motor vehicle or motor vehicles with the express or implied permission of such named insured, against loss from the liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of such motor vehicle or motor vehicles within the United States of America or the Dominion of Canada, subject to limits exclusive of interest and costs, with respect to each such motor vehicle as follows: Twenty-five thousand dollars because of bodily injury to or death of one person in any one accident and, subject to such limit for one person, fifty thousand dollars because of bodily injury to or death of two or more persons in any one accident, and twenty-five thousand dollars because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one accident.
Notes of Decisions
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hildebrand, 502 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 18× “The district courts granted summary judgments, declaring that the household exclusion in the State Farm policies violates Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-534 (Reissue 1988) (policy contents for proof of financial responsibility under the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act) and,…”
Nat'l Am. Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Inc. v. Cont'l W. Ins., 502 N.W.2d 817 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 8× “) On July 16, 1990, the district court found that endorsement *770 PP 03 26 was unenforceable because it was contrary to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-534 (Reissue 1988). The court further declared that the Continental Western policy provided primary liability coverage up to its policy…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. D.F. Lanoha Landscape Nursery, Inc., 553 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1996).
· cites it 3× “) Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-534 (Reissue 1993). “ ‘Thus permission is not limited to that expressly granted, but may arise and be implied from a course of conduct pursued with knowledge of the facts for a considerable time, as where there is a prolonged, frequent, and habitual use…”
State Farm Mut. Ins. Companies v. AMCO Ins., 621 N.W.2d 553 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 4× “Initial Permittee and Second Permittee Rules In Nebraska, automobile insurance policies must insure the driver named in the policy, the “named insured,” as well as any other person using the automobile with the named insured’s express or implied permission.”
Prot. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Cornelius, 125 N.W.2d 179 (Neb. 1963).
· cites it 2× “” It is provided by section 60-534, R. R. S.' 1943, which we shall hereafter designate as the omnibus statute, in part as follows: “Such owner’s policy of liability insurance: (1) Shall designate by explicit description or by appropriate reference all motor vehicles with respect…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Pierce, 157 N.W.2d 399 (Neb. 1968).
· cites it 10× “The trial court’s finding that the driver exclusion agreement was void as against public policy is based upon an interpretation of section 60-534, R. S. Supp., 1965. This section, which has sometimes been referred to as the omnibus statute, is a part of the Motor Vehicle Safety…”
Allied Mut. Ins. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 502 N.W.2d 484 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 2× “The district court found, on the basis of stipulated facts, that the “household exclusion” in State Farm’s policy relieved State Farm of its duty to defend Messersmith against Gonzales’ bodily injury claim and that the financial responsibility requirements contained in Neb. Rev.…”
Am. States Ins. v. Farm Bureau Ins., 583 N.W.2d 358 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-534 (Reissue 1993) provides that a “motor vehicle liability policy .”
Universal Underwriters Ins. v. Farm Bureau Ins., 498 N.W.2d 333 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 5× “Section 60-534 requires an insurance policy to insure the person named in the policy as well as any person who drives the insured vehicle with the permission of the named insured.”
Smith v. Canal Ins. Co., 173 N.W.2d 36 (Neb. 1969).
“” § 60-534, R. R. S. 1943. “Such . . . policy shall insure the person named as insured therein against .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.