Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-535 (2026)

Policy; coverage for nonowned vehicle

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Such motor vehicle liability policy shall insure the person named as insured therein against loss from the liability imposed upon him by law for damages arising out of the use by him of any motor vehicle not owned by him, within the same territorial limits and subject to the same limits of liability as are set forth in section 60-534 with respect to a motor vehicle liability policy.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1969–1998 · leading case: Allied Mut. Ins. v. Musil, 493 N.W.2d 171 (Neb. 1992).
Allied Mut. Ins. v. Musil, 493 N.W.2d 171 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 5× “This evidence, combined with the evidence concerning the driver’s living arrangements, establishes as a matter of law that the Blazer was furnished and was available for the driver’s regular use while he was a member of the named insured’s, that is, the father’s, family.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hildebrand, 502 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “2d 171, 174 (1992), this court held that § 60-535 pertains "only to policies which have been filed with the Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles and certified as proof of future financial responsibility pursuant to the requirements of the [Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility…”
Rudder v. Am. Stand. Ins. Co. of Wis., 194 N.W.2d 175 (Neb. 1972). · cites it 6× “to any automobile owned by or hired, furnished or available for the *780 regular use of such named insured, spouse or any resident of the same household.”
Am. Fam. Ins. Grp. v. Hemenway, 575 N.W.2d 143 (Neb. 1998). “After finding that the exclusion was not preempted by § 60-535 because the policy was not utilized for proof of financial responsibility, we stated: Being referred to no statute which prohibits the aforedescribed family-use exception in a policy of automobile liability insurance…”
Allied Mut. Ins. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 502 N.W.2d 484 (Neb. 1993). “” Similarly, we hold today that the definition of “financial responsibility,” used in § 60-501(10), applies only to policies used as proof of financial responsibility specifically required for compliance with the Nebraska Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act.”
Smith v. Canal Ins. Co., 173 N.W.2d 36 (Neb. 1969). “” § 60-535, R. R. S. 1943. “. . . (1) The liability of the insurance carrier with respect to the insurance required by sections 60-501 to 60-569 shall became absolute whenever injury or damage covered by said .”
Danner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 578 N.W.2d 902 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “because the insurance policies in question do provide for such coverage.” Danner then perfected his appeal to this court.”
Allied Mut. Ins. v. State Farm Mut., 502 N.W.2d 484 (Neb. 1993). “" Similarly, we hold today that the definition of "financial responsibility," used in § 60-501(10), applies only to policies used as proof of financial responsibility specifically required for compliance with the Nebraska Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.