Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-103 (2026)

Practice by nonresident attorneys; requirements; reciprocity

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any regularly admitted practicing attorney in the courts of record of another state or territory, having professional business in the courts of record of this state may, on motion, be admitted to practice for the purpose of said business only in any of said courts upon taking the oath as required by section 7-104, and upon it being made to appear to the court by a written showing filed therein that he has associated and appearing with him in the action an attorney who is a resident of Nebraska duly and regularly admitted to practice in the courts of record of this state upon whom service may be had in all matters connected with said action with the same effect as if personally made on such foreign attorney within this state; Provided, regularly licensed practicing attorneys of other states, the laws of which states permit the practice in its courts of attorneys from this state without a local attorney being associated with such attorney, shall not be required to comply with the provisions of this section.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1999 · leading case: Holste v. Burlington N. R.R., 592 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Holste v. Burlington N. R.R., 592 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “The district court struck Kaplan’s amended attorney’s lien, finding that it had not been presented by a Nebraska attorney as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-103 (Reissue 1997). The district court then stated that “in regard to the attorneys of quantum meruit, Mr.”

Emry v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 334 N.W.2d 786 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “Notwithstanding the wording of the court rule referred to, we note that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-103 (Reissue 1977) provides for the admission of practicing attorneys of other states to be admitted to practice for the purpose of said business upon the showing that “he has associated…”

State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Bigelow, 334 N.W.2d 444 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 3× “Baker and one Daniel Jon Loomis, who was admitted to practice in this state at that time pro hac vice, pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-103 (Reissue 1977). Mr.”

Parnell v. WV Supreme Court (4th Cir. 1997). “§ 7-104 (same); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-103 (same); Nev. Rule of Court 10-2 (same); N.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.