Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 71
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-1201 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 71-1201 to 71-1226.01 shall be known and may be cited as the Sex Offender Commitment Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: In Re Interest of JR, 762 N.W.2d 305 (Neb. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Interest of JR, 762 N.W.2d 305 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 3× “Additionally, we conclude that SOCA does not violate the Equal Protection Clauses, as dangerous sex offenders are not similarly situated to other non-sex-related offenders and because the Legislature had a rational and legitimate basis for treating sex offenders differently than…”
In re Interest of L.T., 886 N.W.2d 525 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “Following 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-1201 et seq. (Reissue 2009).”
D.I. v. Gibson, 890 N.W.2d 506 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “On 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-1201 to 71-1226 (Reissue 2009).”
United States v. Comstock, 507 F. Supp. 2d 522 (E.D.N.C. 2007). “” Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 71-1201 et. seq., and Neb.”
In Re Interest of OS, 763 N.W.2d 723 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “Because the State presented no evidence regarding treatment options outside Corrections, we reverse the district court's decision that involuntary, inpatient treatment is the least restrictive treatment alternative. We remand the cause back to the district court with directions…”
Johnson v. Iowa Dist. Court for Story Cnty., 756 N.W.2d 845 (Iowa 2008). “480 (2008); Nebraska, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-1201 (2007); New Jersey, N.”
In Re Interest of DV, 763 N.W.2d 717 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “In October 2007, a petition was filed asking that he be found to be a dangerous sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Commitment Act (SOCA), Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 71-1201 to 71-1226 (Cum.”
In re Interest of K.C., 984 N.W.2d 277 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 35 Similarly, the State asserts that the order “made findings .”
United States v. Volungus, 599 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D. Mass. 2009). “135-E:1 to :23; Neb. Rev. Stat §§ 71-1201 to -1226; NJ. Stat.”
In Re Gh, 781 N.W.2d 438 (Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “We conclude that Lukin's testimony was sufficient as a matter of law to meet the State's burden of justifying civil commitment of a dangerous sex offender under SOCA.”
In re Interest of R.T., 30 Neb. Ct. App. 405 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-1201 to 71-1226 (Reissue 2018).”
Jones v. Whitmire (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 4× “Jones is [a] mentally ill and dangerous sex offender in need of board ordered inpatient treatment under the Nebraska Mental Health Commitment Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-1201 et seq. 2. The Mental Health Board lacked jurisdiction over the Subject.”
Show all 33 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.