Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 (2026)
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
71-148.
Transferred to section 38-179.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1963–2008 · leading case: Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008).
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). “§ 71-148 (Reissue 1990) reads: “For the purpose of section 71-147, unprofessional conduct shall include any of the following acts,” trailed by 15 defining clauses, none of which deal with the prescribing of drugs____ The State acknowledges that neither § 71-148 nor the rules and…”
Head v. New Mexico Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U.S. 424 (1963). “Codes § 66-1302 (11); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 ; Nev. Rev. Stat.”
Curry v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 496 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. 1993). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 1990) reads: “For the purpose of section 71-147, unprofessional conduct shall include *701 any of the following acts,” trailed by 15 defining clauses, none of which deal with the prescribing of drugs.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148(13) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148(22) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.