Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

71-148.

Transferred to section 38-179.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1963–2008 · leading case: Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008).
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 35× “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 7× “§ 71-148 (Reissue 1990) reads: “For the purpose of section 71-147, unprofessional conduct shall include any of the following acts,” trailed by 15 defining clauses, none of which deal with the prescribing of drugs____ The State acknowledges that neither § 71-148 nor the rules and…”
Head v. New Mexico Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U.S. 424 (1963). · cites it 2× “Codes § 66-1302 (11); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 ; Nev. Rev. Stat.”
Curry v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 496 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 10× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 1990) reads: “For the purpose of section 71-147, unprofessional conduct shall include *701 any of the following acts,” trailed by 15 defining clauses, none of which deal with the prescribing of drugs.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148(13) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-148(22) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “But the State later moved to dismiss the allegation of practice beyond the authorized scope, leaving only the allegations of unprofessional conduct under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-148 (Reissue 2003) and 172 Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.