Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-502 (2026)

Pipeline carriers; powers

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Pipeline carriers which are declared common carriers under section 75-501, pipeline carriers approved under the Major Oil Pipeline Siting Act, and pipeline carriers for which the Governor approves a route under section 57-1503 may store, transport, or convey any liquid or gas, or the products thereof, and make reasonable charges therefor, may lay down, construct, maintain, and operate pipelines, tanks, pump stations, connections, fixtures, storage plants, and such machinery, apparatus, devices, and arrangement as may be necessary to operate such pipes or pipelines between different points in this state, and may use and occupy such lands, rights-of-way, easements, franchises, buildings, and structures as may be necessary to construct and maintain them.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1946–2015 · leading case: United Mineral Prods. Co. v. Nebraska Railroads of W. Trunk Lines Comm., 121 N.W.2d 492 (Neb. 1963).
United Mineral Prods. Co. v. Nebraska Railroads of W. Trunk Lines Comm., 121 N.W.2d 492 (Neb. 1963). · cites it 2× “Was the former rate structure discriminatory? Section 75-502, R. R. S. 1943, prohibits the railroads from giving any undue preference or advantage to any particular person or locality, or subjecting any particular description of traffic to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or…”
Chicago & North W. Ry. Co. v. Mallory, 23 N.W.2d 735 (Neb. 1946). · cites it 2× “Section 75-502, R. S. 1943, is cited by the appellants, as stating: If any railway company or common carrier as defined in section 75-301, through or by its officers, agents or employees, makes any particular person, company, firm, corporation or locality, or subjects particular…”
Thompson v. Heineman (Neb. 2015). · cites it 4× “The State also relies on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-502 (Cum. Supp. 2014), which was amended by L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.