Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 76-1401 to 76-1449 shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Stuthman v. Stuthman, 515 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1994).
Stuthman v. Stuthman, 515 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 5× “) Sections 76-1401 to 76-1449 constitute Nebraska’s URLTA.”
NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. Holcomb, 993 N.W.2d 105 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 4× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 et seq. (Reissue 2018).”
United States v. Univ. of Nebraska at Kearney, 940 F. Supp. 2d 974 (D. Neb. 2013). · cites it 2× “” First, UNK points out that university housing has been exempted from the Nebraska Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 76-1401 et seq. See Neb.Rev.”
Sellers v. Reefer Sys., 305 Neb. 868 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “868 In Black, we indicated that the tenant “need only present some evidence to the trial court upon which the court can make a meaningful award.”
Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “In support of the cause of action for possession, Johnson alleged that the initial term of the lease had run and was on a month-to-month basis when Johnson served a 30-day notice 1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-1401 to 76-1449 (Reissue 2018 & Cum.”
Mason v. Schumacher, 439 N.W.2d 61 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “Schumacher, Mason’s former landlords, and sought (1) damages for conversion of his personal property and (2) liquidated and actual damages for unlawful ouster and wrongful withholding of his security deposit, pursuant to Nebraska’s Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act…”
Dreesen Enters. v. Dreesen, 308 Neb. 433 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “15 The court found that there was an oral agreement between Daniel and Rose in which Rose would pay $500 per month to reside at the property and that she had not paid the agreed- upon rent.”
REO Enters. v. Vill. of Dorchester, 312 Neb. 792 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “Summary Judgment Evidence. REO and the village eventually filed cross-motions for sum- mary judgment.”
REO Enters. v. Vill. of Dorchester, 306 Neb. 683 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “2 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-1401 to 76-1449 (Reissue 2018).”
Crawford v. Yotty, 828 N.W.2d 295 (Iowa 2013). “§§ 70-24-101 to -442; Neb.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 76-1401 to -1449; N.”
Saint Joseph Tower Assisted Living v. Royce, 320 Neb. 830 (Neb. 2026). · cites it 4× “” On October 9, Saint Joseph provided Royce a letter stating that her apartment 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-1401 to 76-1449 (Reissue 2018, Cum.”
Dollison v. Mercy Servs. Corp., 584 N.W.2d 674 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Dollison alleged that Mercy Services had been negligent, that Mercy Services had breached an express contract by violating a provision of the lease, and that Mercy Services had breached an implied contract to provide a reasonably safe place to live, in contravention of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.