Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 76
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2301 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 76-2301 to 76-2334 shall be known and may be cited as the One-Call Notification System Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2021 · leading case: Mercer v. North Cent. Serv., 308 Neb. 224 (Neb. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mercer v. North Cent. Serv., 308 Neb. 224 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2301 et seq. (Reissue 2009 & Cum.”
Galaxy Telecom, L.L.C. v. J.P. Theisen & Sons, Inc., 656 N.W.2d 444 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “Galaxy sought recovery for damage caused by Theisen to an underground fiber-optic cable, based upon alternate theories of strict liability under the Nebraska One-Call Notification System Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-2301 to 76-2330 (Reissue 1996), and negligence.”
Galaxy Telecom, L.L.C. v. SRS, Inc., 689 N.W.2d 866 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Galaxy asserted theories of recovery for strict liability, under the provisions of the One-Call Notification System Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-2301 et seq. (Reissue 1996), concerning notices required by excavators, and for negligence in failing to determine the location of cables…”
Hughes v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 735 N.W.2d 793 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 4× “(b) One-Call Notification System Act In 1994, the Legislature enacted the One-Call Notification System Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-2301 to 76-2330 (Reissue 1996).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.