Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 79
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1108 (2026)

Learners with high ability; identification and programs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each school district shall identify learners with high ability and may provide accelerated or differentiated curriculum programs that will address the educational needs of the identified students at levels appropriate for the abilities of those students. The accelerated or differentiated curriculum programs shall meet the standards of quality established by the department. Educational service units may identify learners with high ability and provide accelerated or differentiated curriculum programs for school districts.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1966–1984 · leading case: Miller v. Sch. Dist. No. 69 of Pawnee Cty., 303 N.W.2d 483 (Neb. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Miller v. Sch. Dist. No. 69 of Pawnee Cty., 303 N.W.2d 483 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 9× “The second reason given by the Lewiston District is that the transfer was void because at the time the transfer was author *295 ized on March 2, 1979, the Filley District was not then accredited, contrary to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1108 (Reissue 1976), which…”
Application of Pribil, 139 N.W.2d 356 (Neb. 1966). · cites it 24× “165 was a nonaccredited district; and that section 79-1108, R. S. Supp., 1963, prohibited the transfer of property from an accredited school district to a nonaccredited school district.”
In Re Covault Freeholder Petition, 359 N.W.2d 349 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 5× “We believe this to be true notwithstanding the fact that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1108 (Reissue 1976) has been amended.”
Sch. Dist. of Gering Etc. v. Stannard, 228 N.W.2d 600 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 12× “e apparent request of intervener Geil, plaintiff commenced this action; We consider first the action of the trial court sustaining demurrers to plaintiffs amended petition and dismissing the same, which demurrers allege that said petition does not set forth facts sufficient to…”
Sch. Dist. of Gering, Etc. v. Stannard, 242 N.W.2d 889 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 2× “” Lastly, we held that the District Court erred in denying the intervention of Geil. The case was remanded to the District Court for proceedings in conformity with the court’s opinion.”
Friesen v. Clark, 220 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 1974). · cites it 3× “2d 356 (1966); Section 79-1108, R.R.S.1943. However, it appears from the record that both the Henderson School District and the McCool School District are fully accredited, and thus this element is not determinative in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.