All requests of whatever
nature upon the treasury of this state, before any warrant is drawn for the
payment of the same, shall be examined, adjusted, and approved by the Department
of Administrative Services. All such requests shall be presented to the Director
of Administrative Services with such documentation as required in the Nebraska
Accounting System Manual on file with the Clerk of the Legislature and shall
be audited and settled within two years after the request accrues. No warrants
shall be drawn for any request until an appropriation has been made therefor.
No warrant for any request for payment or reimbursement of any mileage or
other traveling expense shall be issued unless the same is computed strictly
in accordance with sections 81-1174 to 81-1177 except as otherwise provided in section 55-157.
Notes of Decisions
Burke v. Bd. of Trs. of the Neb. State Colls., 302 Neb. 494 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “And because we conclude that § 25-21,206 does not apply on this record, we need not address the Board's argument that Burke cannot rely on § 25-21,206 because she failed to comply with the presuit procedures of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1170.01 (Reissue 2014).”
Livengood v. Nebraska State Patrol Ret. Sys., 729 N.W.2d 55 (Neb. 2007).
· cites it 15× “01 Does Not Apply to the Officers’ Claims The Appellants also contend that the Officers’ claims presented a request on the treasury subject to the requirements of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1170.01 (Reissue 1999).”
Hoiengs v. Cnty. of Adams, 516 N.W.2d 223 (Neb. 1994).
· cites it 2× “(i) System We note first of all that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1170.01 (Cum. Supp. 1992) requires that, with certain exceptions not relevant here, persons having claims against the state shall present the same, with appropriate documentation, to the Director of Administrative…”
Burke v. Bd. of Trs., 302 Neb. 494 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “Burke’s complaint does not contain the necessary factual allegations to satisfy § 25-21,202, and therefore she cannot rely on § 25-21,206 to waive the State’s sovereign immunity here.”
Burke v. Bd. of Trs., 302 Neb. 494 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “Burke’s complaint does not contain the necessary factual allegations to satisfy § 25-21,202, and therefore she cannot rely on § 25-21,206 to waive the State’s sovereign immunity here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.