Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1901 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 81-1901 to 81-1936 shall be known and may be cited as the Licensing of Truth and Deception Examiners Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–2003 · leading case: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hildebrand, 502 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1993).
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Hildebrand, 502 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1993). “2d 510 (1987) (an employer's discharge of an employee who refused to take a polygraph examination prohibited by the Licensing of Truth and Deception Examiner's Act, Neb. Rev.Stat. § 81-1901 et seq. (Reissue 1981 & Cum.”
Jackson v. Morris Commc'ns Corp., 657 N.W.2d 634 (Neb. 2003). “Cornhusker Square Ltd., supra. A violation of § 81-1932 is a Class II misdemeanor.”
Ambroz v. Cornhusker Square Ltd., 416 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1987). “Section 81-1932 (Reissue 1981) provides: No employer or prospective employer may require as a condition of employment or as a condition for continued *901 employment that a person submit to a truth and deception examination unless such employment involves public law enforcement.”
Schriner v. Meginnis Ford Co., 421 N.W.2d 755 (Neb. 1988). “Section 81-1932 of the act provides, among other things, that, with an exception not relevant to the facts in Ambroz , no employer may require as a condition of continued employment that a person submit to a truth and deception examination.”
Riley v. State, 506 N.W.2d 45 (Neb. 1993). “§ 81-1401 (3) (Reissue 1987), and declare the rights of the parties under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1901 et seq. (Reissue 1987 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.