Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 83
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1043 (2026)

Transferred to section 71-930

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

83-1043.

Transferred to section 71-930.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1978–2003 · leading case: State v. Guatney, 299 N.W.2d 538 (Neb. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Guatney, 299 N.W.2d 538 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissue 1976). If an individual had been unlawfully committed to the Lincoln Regional Center and had filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking his release, which writ was denied, he would be entitled to appeal that order to this court.”
Saville v. Burt Cnty. Mental Health Bd., 626 N.W.2d 644 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissue 1999); Lux v.”
Lux v. Mental Health Bd. of Polk Cty., 274 N.W.2d 141 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 6× “This is an appeal under the provisions of section 83-1043, R. R. S. 1943, from an order of the District Court for Polk County, affirming the county mental health board’s order finding that the appellant, Lawrence G.”
Slack Nursing Home, Inc. v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 528 N.W.2d 285 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 3× “Appeals from final orders of the mental health board were, and still are, governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissues 1976 & 1994) rather than the APA.”
Kochner v. Mental Health Bd., 662 N.W.2d 195 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “The district court, sitting as an appellate court under § 83-1043, affirmed the Board’s decision, and Kochner appealed.”
In Re Interest of Tweedy, 488 N.W.2d 528 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 4× “See, also, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissue 1987). While we have said that the actual assessment of the likelihood of danger calls for an exercise of medical judgment, the sufficiency of the evidence to support such a determination is fundamentally a legal question.”
Kraemer v. Mental Health Bd., 261 N.W.2d 626 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 2× “From that order *786 of the State Board of Mental Health, Kraemer appealed to the District Court for Lancaster County under the authority of section 83-1043, R. R. S. 1943. The District Court affirmed the order of the State Board of Mental Health.”
Hill v. Cnty. Bd. of Mental Health, 279 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 5× “This is an appeal under the provisions of section 83-1043, R. R. S. 1943, from an order of the District Court for Douglas County, affirming the order of the county mental health board.”
In Re Interest of McDonell, 427 N.W.2d 779 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissue 1987).”
State v. Irwin, 302 N.W.2d 386 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 2× “However, even if the defendant should face commitment proceedings under the alleged unconstitutional statute, he will at that time have the opportunity to present his constitutional claim, and also an opportunity to appeal any adverse ruling to the District Court pursuant to the…”
In Interest of Rasmussen, 462 N.W.2d 621 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 2× “A district court’s review of an appeal from a mental health board is de novo on the record.”
In Re Interest of Ely, 371 N.W.2d 724 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “This is an appeal under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1043 (Reissue 1981) from an order of the district court for Lancaster County affirming an order of the mental health board of Lancaster County.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.