Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 83
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-185 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

83-185.

Transferred to section 83-4,114.01.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1970–2014 · leading case: Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). · cites it 6× “*545 Section 16 of the Nebraska Treatment and Corrections Act, as amended, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-185 (Cum. Supp. 1972), [5] provides that the chief executive officer of each penal facility is responsible for the discipline of inmates *546 in a particular institution.”
Carrillo v. Fabian, 701 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 6× “2963 ; see Neb.Rev.Stat. § 83-185 (1971). In Nebraska, good time credits were revocable only if the prisoner was found guilty of serious misconduct.”
Shepard v. Houston, 289 Neb. 399 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “01(2), previously located at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-185 (2) (Reissue 1987), good time may be forfeited only in cases involving “flagrant or Nebraska Advance Sheets SHEPARD v.”
Brooks v. Shanks, 885 P.2d 637 (N.M. 1994). “2d 935 (1974) (holding that state statute specifying that good-time credits could be forfeited only “ ‘[i]n cases of flagrant or serious misconduct’” provided right to good-time credits which could be forfeited only for incidents of serious misbehavior (quoting Neb.Rev.Stat. §…”
Sawyer v. Sigler, 320 F. Supp. 690 (D. Neb. 1970). · cites it 2× “” *698 Furthermore, § 83-185 Nebraska R.R.S.1943, as amended, provides in part: “(1) The chief executive officer of each facility shall be responsible for the discipline of those persons committed to the Division of Corrections who reside therein.”
McDonnell v. Wolff, 342 F. Supp. 616 (D. Neb. 1972). “” Further, § 83-185(2) provides that “[e]xcept in flagrant or serious cases, punishment for misconduct shall consist of deprivation of privileges.”
State v. Maddox, 208 N.W.2d 274 (Neb. 1973). “See § 83-185(2), R. R. S. 1943. Defendant appeals.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-185(2) — 3 cases
Brooks v. Shanks, 885 P.2d 637 (N.M. 1994). “2d 935 (1974) (holding that state statute specifying that good-time credits could be forfeited only “ ‘[i]n cases of flagrant or serious misconduct’” provided right to good-time credits which could be forfeited only for incidents of serious misbehavior (quoting Neb.Rev.Stat. §…”
McDonnell v. Wolff, 342 F. Supp. 616 (D. Neb. 1972). “” Further, § 83-185(2) provides that “[e]xcept in flagrant or serious cases, punishment for misconduct shall consist of deprivation of privileges.”
State v. Maddox, 208 N.W.2d 274 (Neb. 1973). “See § 83-185(2), R. R. S. 1943. Defendant appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.