Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 85-1528 (2026)

Teachers and school nurses; contract; renewal; exceptions; amend or terminate; notice; hearings; decision

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The contracts of the teaching staff and school nurses employed by a board of a community college shall require the sanction of a majority of the members of the board. Except as provided in section 85-1534, each such contract shall be deemed renewed and in force and effect until a majority of the board votes, sixty days before the close of the contract period, to amend or terminate the contract for just cause. The secretary of the board shall notify each teacher or school nurse in writing at least ninety days before the close of the contract period of any conditions of unsatisfactory performance or a reduction in teaching staff or nursing staff that the board considers may be just cause to either amend or terminate the contract for the ensuing year. Any teacher or school nurse so notified shall have the right to file within five days of receipt of such notice a written request with the board for a hearing before the board. Upon receipt of such request, the board shall order the hearing to be held within ten days and shall give written notice of the time and place of the hearing to the teacher or school nurse. At the hearing, evidence shall be presented in support of the reasons given for considering amendment or termination of the contract, and the teacher or school nurse shall be permitted to produce evidence related thereto. The board shall render the decision to amend or terminate a contract based on the evidence produced at the hearing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Apland v. Ne. Cmty. Coll., 599 N.W.2d 233 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999).
Apland v. Ne. Cmty. Coll., 599 N.W.2d 233 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 10× “The trial court entered its judgment on January 12, 1998, holding that Apland was a “teacher” for purposes of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 85-1528 (Reissue 1994), which provides that approval or amendment of all contracts of the teaching staff of a community college must be sanctioned by…”
Ackerman v. Metro. Cmty. Coll. Area, 575 N.W.2d 181 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 7× “The relevant statutes for consideration of whether the RIF policy was required to be applicable to part-time employees as well as full-time employees are §§ 85-1528 through 85-1530, primarily § 85-1530.”
Bayson (D. Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 85-1528 . The state Department of Education's regulations make the same distinction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.