Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-703 (2026)

Telecommunications company, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Telecommunications company has the same meaning as in section 86-119.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1976–1999 · leading case: State v. Myers, 603 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1999).
State v. Myers, 603 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 10× “Section 86-703 provides in part: The Attorney General or any county attorney may make application to any district court of this state for an order authorizing or approving the interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications.”
State v. Kolosseus, 253 N.W.2d 157 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 6× “, section 2516 (2), and section 86-703, R. R. S. 1943. Federal law preempts the field in the area of interception of oral or wire communications and prohibits the use of such intercepted communications or any evidence derived therefrom, if the disclosure is in violation of Title…”
State v. Hinton, 415 N.W.2d 138 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “" § 86-703 (Reissue 1981). Section 86-701(4) (Cum.”
State v. Lozano, 311 N.W.2d 529 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 2× “The defendant also argues that the affidavits accompanying the application for wiretap authority were not sufficient to establish probable cause that she was committing, had committed, or was about to commit a crime enumerated by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-703 (Reissue 1976). One of…”
State v. Myers, 603 N.W.2d 378 (Neb. 1999). “Myers also moved in limine to keep out evidence and testimony related to gangs, previous felony convictions, and communications intercepted via a wiretap, including conversations between Henley and Myers’ sister, Sheila Myers.”
United States v. Van Horn, 579 F. Supp. 804 (D. Neb. 1984). · cites it 3× “The Nebraska wiretap statute, 3 section 86-703, provides, inter alia, that “the *810 Court may grant an order authorizing or approving the interception of wire or oral communications by law enforcement officers having responsibility for the investigation of the offense as to…”
State v. Holmes, 302 N.W.2d 382 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 2× “d, authorizing or approving interception of wire or oral communications within the territorial jurisdiction of the court in which the judge is sitting, if the judge determines on the basis of the facts submitted by the applicant that: (a) There is probable cause for belief…”
State v. Brennen, 336 N.W.2d 79 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “” In his brief defendant argues that the affidavit and its amendment were not sufficient to establish probable cause that he was committing, had committed, or was about to commit a crime enumerated by § 86-703. One of the enumerated crimes in that section is “dealing in narcotic…”
State v. Hinchion, 299 N.W.2d 748 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 2× “d, authorizing or approving interception of wire or oral communications within the territorial jurisdiction of the court in which the judge is sitting, if the judge determines on the basis of the facts submitted by the applicant that: (a) There is probable cause for belief that…”
State v. Abramson, 247 N.W.2d 59 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 2× “The sentences were affirmed in the District Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.