Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 9
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203 (2026)

Definitions, where found

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of the Nebraska Bingo Act, unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions found in sections 9-204 to 9-225.02 shall be used.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Matter of Wiegert, 145 B.R. 621 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Wiegert, 145 B.R. 621 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “Under § 9-203 of the Nebraska Uniform Commercial Code, a security interest is not enforceable unless: 1) the debtor signs a security agreement which contains a description of the collateral; 2) value has been given; and 3) the debtor has rights in the collateral.”
Barelmann v. Fox, 478 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1992). “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980) provides three basic prerequisites to the existence of a security interest: agreement, value, and collateral.”
Maryott v. Oconto Cattle Co., 607 N.W.2d 820 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 9-203 (Supp. 1995) to the cattle at issue and if that interest has priority over Maryott’s unperfected security interest.”
First Nat'l Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen (In Re Hansen), 60 B.R. 359 (D. Neb. 1982). · cites it 5× “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980) (attachment and formal requirements for enforceability of security interests) states: The theory of equitable mortgage, insofar as it has operated to allow creditors to enforce informal security agreements against debtors, may well have developed as a…”
Crete State Bank v. Lauhoff Grain Co., 239 N.W.2d 789 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 2× “The root question appears to be whether the financing statements were sufficient to constitute security agreements required by section 9-203, U.C.C. That section provides that a security interest in collateral not in the possession of the secured party is not enforceable unless…”
Farmland Serv. Coop., Inc. v. S. Hills Ranch, Inc., 665 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003). “§ 9-203(1) (Reissue 1992). Goods were defined as “farm products” if they are crops or livestock or supplies used or produced in farming operations or if they are products of crops or livestock in their unmanufactured states (such as ginned cotton, wool-clip, maple syrup, milk…”
Circle 76 Fertilizer, Inc. v. Nelsen, 365 N.W.2d 460 (Neb. 1985). “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980), which was timely filed.”
Cattle Nat'l Bank v. York State Bank & Trust Co., 428 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 3× “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980) further provides that such interest could not have attached.”
VAL-U CONST. CO. OF SD v. Contractors, Inc., 328 N.W.2d 774 (Neb. 1983). “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980) requires that the debtor sign the security agreement, that value be given, and that the debtor have rights in the collateral.”
PSK v. Legacy Outdoor Advert., 318 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2024). “§ 9-203 (Reissue 2020); Neb. U.C.C. § 9-310 (Cum.”
Skane, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha (In Re Damrow Cattle Co.), 300 B.R. 479 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 9-203. All of the corn was delivered pursuant to an oral agreement.”
O'Neill Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Olson (In Re Olson), 22 B.R. 473 (D. Neb. 1982). “) § 9-203 (Reissue 1980). This security interest would appear to have priority over most, if not all, earlier security interests involved in this proceeding.”
Show all 31 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(1) — 8 cases
Farmland Serv. Coop., Inc. v. S. Hills Ranch, Inc., 665 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003). “§ 9-203(1) (Reissue 1992). Goods were defined as “farm products” if they are crops or livestock or supplies used or produced in farming operations or if they are products of crops or livestock in their unmanufactured states (such as ginned cotton, wool-clip, maple syrup, milk…”
Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. McDermott & Miller, 449 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 1989).
Skane, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha (In Re Damrow Cattle Co.), 300 B.R. 479 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2003). “§ 9-203. All of the corn was delivered pursuant to an oral agreement.”
Am. Nat'l Bank v. Joy (In Re Joy), 169 B.R. 931 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1994).
Siemers v. AG Servs. of Am., Inc. (In Re Siemers), 249 B.R. 205 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2000).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(5)(a) — 2 cases
Siemers v. AG Servs. of Am., Inc. (In Re Siemers), 249 B.R. 205 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2000).
Metro. Life Ins. v. Reeves-Gustafson, 422 N.W.2d 72 (Neb. 1988).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(a) — 1 case
Overcash v. Bank of Dixon Cnty. (Bankr. D. Neb. 2022).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(b) — 1 case
Overcash v. Bank of Dixon Cnty. (Bankr. D. Neb. 2022).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(b)(2) — 1 case
Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Cheran Investments (Neb. Ct. App. 2014).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(b)(3) — 1 case
Lol Fin. Co. v. Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., 758 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Neb. 2010).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(l)(a) — 1 case
First Nat'l Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen (In Re Hansen), 60 B.R. 359 (D. Neb. 1982). “§ 9-203 (Reissue 1980) (attachment and formal requirements for enforceability of security interests) states: The theory of equitable mortgage, insofar as it has operated to allow creditors to enforce informal security agreements against debtors, may well have developed as a…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-203(l)(c) — 2 cases
Melcher v. Bank of Madison, 529 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
Metro. Life Ins. v. Reeves-Gustafson, 422 N.W.2d 72 (Neb. 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.