Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-401 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 9-401 to 9-437 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp., 631 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 2001).
Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp., 631 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “In its order on remand, the district court stated that although the court did not believe it critical to the outcome of the case, it accepted the following “propositions of law” from the memorandum opinion of this court as constituting the law of the case: (1) Defendant City of…”
Blanchard v. City of Ralston, 559 N.W.2d 735 (Neb. 1997). “Code §§ 9-401 through 9-406 because Blanchard had not been given proper notice or reasonable time to repair her property prior to demolition.”
Blanchard v. City of Ralston, 549 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 3× “Code § 9-401 and further opined that it should be demolished and removed pursuant to Ralston Mun.”
Meints v. Vill. of Diller, No. A-20-597 (Neb. Ct. App. June 1, 2021). “Code § 9-401 et seq. Furthermore, courts generally hold that a city is not liable for a taking if it destroys or damages private property while properly exercising its police power in abating a nuisance or public health hazard.”
Bus. Dev. Corp. v. Wolf (In re Tri-Valley Transp., Inc.), 18 B.R. 628 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “section 9-401(l)(c) Supp.1978 (amended 1980) provided for filing in the county where the office of the last appointed resident agent is located.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-401(l)(c): 1 case
Bus. Dev. Corp. v. Wolf (In re Tri-Valley Transp., Inc.), 18 B.R. 628 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1982). “section 9-401(l)(c) Supp.1978 (amended 1980) provided for filing in the county where the office of the last appointed resident agent is located.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.