NRS
1.4663 Appointment of investigator; designation of special counsel;
conduct, scope and written report of investigation.
1. If the Commission determines pursuant
to NRS 1.4657 that a complaint alleges
objectively verifiable evidence from which a reasonable inference could be
drawn that a judge committed misconduct or is incapacitated, the Commission
shall assign or appoint an investigator to conduct an investigation to
determine whether the allegations have merit. The Commission may designate
special counsel at any time after a complaint is filed with the Commission
pursuant to NRS 1.4655.
2. Such an investigation must be conducted
in accordance with procedural rules adopted by the Commission and may extend to
any matter that is, in the determination of the Commission, reasonably related
to an allegation of misconduct or incapacity contained in the complaint.
3. An investigator assigned or appointed
by the Commission to conduct an investigation pursuant to this section may, for
the purpose of investigation, compel by subpoena on behalf of the Commission
the attendance of witnesses and the production of necessary materials as set
forth in NRS 1.466.
4. At the conclusion of the investigation,
the investigator shall prepare a written report of the investigation for review
by the Commission.
(Added to NRS by 1997,
1089; A 2009,
1341)
Notes of Decisions
Mosley v. Nevada Comm'n on Jud. Discipline, 22 P.3d 655 (Nev. 2001).
· cites it 4× “" [6] See CPR 11-12; see also NRS 1.4663 (providing that, if the Commission determines that the complaint states allegations which, if true, establish grounds for discipline, the Commission must authorize an investigation of the charges).”
Jones v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline, 2014 NV 11 (Nev. 2014).
· cites it 8× “See NRS 1.4663 (governing investigations of alleged misconduct to determine whether to issue a formal statement of charges); NRS 1.”
Andress-Tobiasson (Melanie) Vs. Nev. Comm'N On Jud. Discipline, 475 P.3d 776 (Nev. 2020).
· cites it 4× “4657 and NRS 1.4663 by authorizing two investigations of complaints that she asserts fail to allege objectively verifiable evidence from which a reasonable inference may be drawn that she committed misconduct.”
In Re: Jud. Discipline of Steven Jones (Nev. 2016).
“NRS 1.4663(2) (providing that investigations may extend to matters "reasonably related to an allegation of misconduct or incapacity contained in the complaint"); Jones v.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 1.4663(1) — 2 cases
Mosley v. Nevada Comm'n on Jud. Discipline, 22 P.3d 655 (Nev. 2001).
“" [6] See CPR 11-12; see also NRS 1.4663 (providing that, if the Commission determines that the complaint states allegations which, if true, establish grounds for discipline, the Commission must authorize an investigation of the charges).”
Jones v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline, 2014 NV 11 (Nev. 2014).
“See NRS 1.4663 (governing investigations of alleged misconduct to determine whether to issue a formal statement of charges); NRS 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 1.4663(2) — 2 cases
In Re: Jud. Discipline of Steven Jones (Nev. 2016).
“NRS 1.4663(2) (providing that investigations may extend to matters "reasonably related to an allegation of misconduct or incapacity contained in the complaint"); Jones v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.