Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 104 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE—ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2102 (2026)

Scope; certain security and other transactions excluded from this article

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.2102  Scope; certain security and other transactions excluded from this article.

      1.  Unless the context otherwise requires, and except as provided in subsection 3, this article applies to transactions in goods and, in the case of a hybrid transaction, it applies to the extent provided in subsection 2.

      2.  In a hybrid transaction:

      (a) If the sale-of-goods aspects do not predominate, only the provisions of this Article which relate primarily to the sale-of-goods aspects of the transactions apply, and the provisions that relate primarily to the transaction as a whole do not apply.

      (b) If the sale-of-goods aspects predominate, this Article applies to the transaction but does not preclude application in appropriate circumstances of other law to the aspects of the transaction which do not relate to the sale of goods.

      3.  This Article does not:

      (a) Apply to a transaction that, even though in the form of an unconditional contract to sell or present sale, operates only to create a security interest; or

      (b) Impair or repeal any statute regulating sales to consumers, farmers or other specified classes of buyers.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 784; A 2023, 3180)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2022 · leading case: Ringle v. Bruton, 86 P.3d 1032 (Nev. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ringle v. Bruton, 86 P.3d 1032 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “2d 163, 165 (1979) (stating that parol evidence is admissible to determine intent when the written contract is ambiguous).”
DR Horton, Inc. v. Green, 96 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2004). “[17] See NRS 104.2102. [18] The reference to NRS 104.”
Living Ecology, Inc. v. Bosch Packaging Tech., Inc. (D. Nev. 2022). “See NRS 104.2102. LEI’s complaint alleges a single cause of 22 action for recission.”
Living Ecology, Inc. v. Bosch Packaging Tech., Inc. (D. Nev. 2022). “See NRS 104.2102. LEI’s complaint alleges a single cause of 22 action for recission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.